Talk:Gingerbread (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Please help complete the Angel/Buffy episode articles. See what needs to be done on this sub-page of WikiProject Buffy:

Wikipedia:WikiProject Buffy/Episodes

Also please help update any major changes made to episode articles on that page so that progress can be mapped.

________________________________________________________

German in the episode[edit]

The discussion about the validity of the German spoken in the episode seems a bit too elaborate for an encyclopedic article. Is it really necessary to discuss at length improperly translated sentences by some TV writer?

It's true the translation may not be the best, but nonetheless this is not a a significatnt element of the episode, and surely doesn't deserve to dominate the article? I have shortened it, and placed the expanded discussion below. -- Paxomen 17:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I'd say that this looks like an attempt to produce older-sounding German (Middle High German or Old High German, perhaps), albeit not a perfect one. Maybe this should be added as a redeeming note. Baranxtu 00:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

German translation[edit]

The German text about the first reported sighting of the two children really is German, but full of mistakes. It reads:

ich, eine Geistlicher von nahe die Schwarz Wälder, tat finden das körper von das kinder meine selbst. eine wurde von die junge, die anderen von und mädchen. darauf meine eigene erforschen ich lernte

Literally translated, this would read:

I, a cleric from the near the Black Forests, did find the bodies of the children myself. One was of the boy, the other of and [sic] girl. Upon my own research I learned ...

Which doesn't sound too bad until you realize that eine is the feminine form while Geistlicher is masculine, Schwarz is singular but Wälder is plural, but the Black Forest ist der Schwarzwald anyway; das is the wrong definite article for Körper (der Körper, plural die Körper, is masculine), Kinder as the plural form of das Kind also demands a die; von das Kinder should be der Kinder (being a genetive); both körper and kinder (as well as ich, eine, junge, mädchen and darauf) should be capitalized -- and so forth through the whole text. In other words, somebody probably just ran the English sentence through a computer. Needless to say, German fans of the show noticed.

Correct German would be something like:

Ich, ein Geistlicher von nahe dem Schwarzwald, tat finden die Körper der Kinder selbst. Einer war von einem Jungen, einer von einem Mädchen. Daraufhin forschte ich selbst und lernte ...

Even then, this would be modern and not 17th century German, which was considerably different in spelling and style.

Giles's spoken German is far better that what the computer provides. (He already proved his impressive German accent in the season 2 episode "Killed by Death".) In the car, he says

Lüften Sie den ...

and struggles to remember the word for "veil", which would be Schleier. The sentence then becomes Lüften Sie den Schleier, "Lift the veil". This is perfectly correct German, though it does leave open whom he is addressing, as this is a direct order to one person in the formal (polite) form. During the first part of the incantation -- before the fire is put out -- die Macht ("the power"), die Macht den Weg bereiten ("clear the path for the power") and das Böse soll das Gesicht des Bösen tragen (roughly "the evil shall have the face of evil") can be understood, with the rest being garbled by Giles. The second part, before he throws the potion, is Versteckt Euch nicht hinter falschen Gesichtern ("Do not hide behind false faces"). Though this is a different form of address than the veil part (a direct order in the familiar plural, as appropriate for two children), all spoken German is in fact correct.

Fair use rationale for Image:Buffy311.jpg[edit]

Image:Buffy311.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]