Talk:Dirty Pretty Things (film)

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

References to use[edit]

Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.

Stein, Rachel (2010). "Disposable Bodies: Biocolonialism in The Constant Gardener and Dirty Pretty Things". In Willoquet-Maricondi, Paula (ed.). Framing the World: Explorations in Ecocriticism and Film. Under the Sign of Nature. University of Virginia Press. ISBN 0813930057.
Wolf, Clark (2009). "Commodification, Exploitation, and the Market for Transplant Organs: A Discussion of Dirty Pretty Things". In Shapshay, Sandra (ed.). Bioethics at the Movies. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 170–185. ISBN 0801890772.

Since few people read talk pages, I went ahead and added this to the article's further reading list WhisperToMe (talk) 10:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

It seems that a lot of this article is POV. Perhaps that should be opened for discussion here.

Kickstart70 00:11, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I agree. The 'Criticism' section is the main culprit. Critique for a film or any work of art should give a balanced perspective, citing good and bad points from published sources. And anything which is less well known or controversial should be linked to an appropriate web page. I have rewritten this section from various reviews on the web but retained the original comments in a reworded form. Now I'm going to watch it:D--ChrisJMoor 01:10, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Status of Senay[edit]

I don't know UK process of immigration, but is Senay actually an "illegal immigrant" in the movie? Those guys from the immigration bureau seemed to imply that she was allowed to be in the country, just not to work. --75.39.141.128 (talk) 23:54, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]