Talk:List of interracial topics

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

keep, 11 November 2015, see discussion.
keep, 3 April 2015, see discussion.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles

Ethnic groups

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Perhaps this should just redirect to Interracial couple? Thue 21:23, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)

If you do that, the pornographic code is lost. On the other hand, if the deletionists have their way, everything is lost. <KF> 06:02, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

From VfD

Interracial[edit]

Dicdef. And an adjective, at that. -- Jmabel 23:06, Jun 10, 2004 (UTC)

Someone tried cleaning this up, but you're right...it's still a dicdef. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 00:38, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. Please refer me (a) to the policy that says that adjectives must not have articles in Wikipedia and (b) to the dictionary that has this "dicdef". Only then should you vote in favour of deletion. <KF> 05:58, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- - What you're looking for is Wiktionary at http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Main_Page , a sister project to Wikipedia. This is an online dictionary that operates on the same principles as this online encyclopedia. A quick search indicates it currently has no definition of "interracial" so yours would presumedly be welcome. MK 03:16, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- An article about an adjective will usually just be a dicdef with a list of the uses, while the encyclopedic content will be under the specific uses of the adjective in conjunktion with the subject. In the case of Interracial this is a dicdef listing 2 uses of the word ("interracial marriage", "interracial sex"). So the "no adjectives" guideline follows from the "no dicdef" rule. I can't quickly find any dictionaries that list the "interracial sex" usage in pornography, but that just means they are incomplete dictionaries, not that the "interracial sex" usage is not a part of a dicdef. Thue 09:13, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
(a) What Wikipedia is not, number 2: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. (b) Listed in the Meriiam Webster] online dictionary. ~~Delete dicdef.~~ SWAdair | Talk 08:04, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I say redirect to interracial couple, and make a mention of interracial sex there. The interracial sex remark is valid info to have, and by redirecting this way no info is lost. Thue 09:13, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Agree with Thue. Redirect / merge. SWAdair | Talk 09:52, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Agree: redirect. -Sean Curtin 03:01, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion