Talk:100 Famous Japanese Mountains

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 18:18, April 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Untitled[edit]

Sorry this page is so crappy... I've run out of time for today to work on it... Jeshii 07:14, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)

I have no idea when I can omit suffixes of Japanese names. I replaced 'peak of' with 'mt.' because I think the former is not common, but the distinction between 山 and 岳 was lost. I commented out the mention of Ainu language, because all mountains of Hokkaido may be derived from Ainu language except Taisetsu. Pitan 14:00, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Page Reform, Restructuring and Completion[edit]

I would like to recategorise some of the regions for this page if no-one minds...am thinking of dividing the page into:

-Hokkaido -Tohoku -Kanto -Chubu -Kansai -Chugoku -Shikoku -Kyushu

The current grouping making Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu into one generic area called "Western Japan" is far too general.

I will also try and complete the list in it's entirity including making pages for every single mountain on the page. Any support, questions or queries would be appreciated... Paulman (talk) 04:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct?[edit]

In the corresponding Japanese article, Mount Amakazari is in Chūbu region (not Kantō region) and Mount Takatsuma is in Tōhoku region / 上信越 (North Japan Sea region?) not in Kantō region. Who is right? bamse (talk) 19:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved both Mountains to the correct region. bamse (talk) 23:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minimum 1.500m ?[edit]

The sentence "excluding mountains with an altitude of less than 1,500 m (4,921 ft)." in the paragraph "History" conflicts with the fact that at least Tsukuba and Kaimon are much lower. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim2007viatge (talk • contribs) 13:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. The inclusion policy was later stated by the author in a presentation (cf. a JAWP remark), but there are always exceptions. Fukuda also made remarks on some omissions, like Mount Hiei, which falls on all three criteria but too much lower than 1,500,　his general altitude inclusion criteria. --Aphaia (talk) 12:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]