Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RFPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Business jet

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent spamming. Long-term pattern of unconstructive edits and spamming. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:27, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Done by User:Lectonar. Malinaccier (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Nabil Gabol

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Saqib (talk) 07:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Malinaccier (talk) 14:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Inside Out 2

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Simonthings18 (talk) 07:25, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Bob Swan

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nobody (talk) 07:45, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC third round

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple edits by IPs against the wishes of regular editors. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 08:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Replika

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Two single-edit accounts and an IP blanking the same sourced paragraph as "false". Belbury (talk) 08:50, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Wanindu Hasaranga

    Reason: High level of vandalism over last two days from various IPs/accounts JP (Talk) 11:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Itavia Flight 870

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Cause of the crash is in dispute again. The Banner talk 11:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Konami Code

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – doesn't seem like it's just one person doing it, at least. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 11:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Vandalism continues, despite (range) blocks. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 14:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Gillian Keegan

    Reason: I'm asking for this page to be semi-protected after posting on Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard yesterday. Several anonymous IPs continue to add original research onto the article despite being reverted by several editors who have the same concern. It is the same edit each time which started happening in February/March but has recently continued again recently Michaeldble (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    The Source with Pinky Webb

    Reason: IP vandalism by several hoaxers keep adding those several CNN Philippines newscast on RPTV BeemoKincaid (talk) 12:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Caucasian dragon carpets

    Reason: There is a risk of edit war. The person deletes sourced content.(Which i reverted with sourced information) We had same issue in Azerbaijani Culture and Meykhana pages. Göycen (talk) 12:16, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Get on the talk page and start discussing with the IP. There is no edit war unless you decide to make one. Fantastic Mr. Fox (talk) 12:36, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Bunty Aur Billy

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism resuming within a day of previous protection expiring. Belbury (talk) 12:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    X (social network)

    Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Given that this is a divisive topic which inspires strong feelings, it should be given the same protection level as Twitter. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. I don't see any recent disruptive editing from new/IP users to justify protection. Writ Keeper  13:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Kingdom of Georgia

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Mellk (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Aq Qoyunlu

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Mellk (talk) 14:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:37, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Already protected by administrator Daniel Case. More than a month ago, in fact.
    User(s) blocked: Ali Kazimov Bey (talk · contribs) blocked by Bbb2. Favonian (talk) 15:57, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Konami Code

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism Aszx5000 (talk) 14:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2027 Cricket World Cup qualification

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikishovel (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Atomic Cartoons

    Reason: Persistent disruptive editing, continued after protection expired. Waxworker (talk) 15:30, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Animax (Latin America)

    Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 15:38, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Gender binary

    Reason: Consistent vandalism, predominantly by IPs TenToe (talk) 15:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Imad Wasim

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping editor vandalising the page. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 16:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Elizabeth Olsen

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trolls intentionally confusing her with her character, Scarlet Witch, and falsely claiming she died. CRBoyer 16:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Kevin Punter

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ImTheAvidPheasant (talk) 16:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup Group D

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs over SA qualification... Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 16:58, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    2026 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC second round

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – At least one user performing the disruption is autoconfirmed. Jalen Folf (Bark[s]) 17:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Snooker

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA noticed the page is no longer protected. Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:11, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Snooker

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LTA disruptive edits Wiiformii (talk) 17:18, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    Brianna Wu

    please update the sources for [12] and [13].

    12: https://archive.ph/ek0sE

    13: https://web.archive.org/web/20161101205623/http://www.briannawu.net/about

    Im not afraid (talk) 04:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I posted an edit request on the talk page there to look at this one. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:06, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Israel–Hamas war

    At present we have "On 24 May, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must immediately halt its Rafah offensive.[1]"

    I suggest changing it to include a longer, semantically-complete, quotation, to read: "On 24 May, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel must immediately halt its military offensive, and any other action in the Rafah governorate, which may inflict on the Palestinian group in Gaza conditions of life that could bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.[2]"

    As the Guardian article points out, and reports judges as arguing, the last comma is critical to the meaning of the ruling. Hunc (talk) 10:49, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    References

    1. ^ "ICJ orders Israel to halt its offensive on Rafah, Gaza in new ruling". Al Jazeera. 2024-05-24. Retrieved 2024-05-24.
    2. ^ How a single comma is allowing Israel to question ICJ Rafah ruling. Israel is among those arguing that international court of justice directive is ambivalent and far from a blanket order to halt its offensive. Patrick Wintour, diplomatic editor. The Guardian. Wed 29 May 2024 https://www.theguardian.com/global/article/2024/may/29/how-a-single-comma-is-allowing-israel-to-question-icj-rafah-ruling

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.