Talk:g-force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the G-force article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 28 days

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Measurement (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2013, when it received 17,177,762 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 7 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Roller coasters[edit]

I wondered about the paragraph on amusement rides, where it is said that they usually don't pull over 3 g with some listed exceptions. However, according to "rcdb.com" and other coaster-related sources, almost every looping coaster on the world pulls about 4-5 g on entering the loop (e.g. the Vekoma Boomerang which is found in many parks around the world is said to pull 5.2 g on its first inversion).—Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.203.254.65 (talk • contribs)

Problem[edit]

The title of the article "g-force" starts with small letter. JelloMello24 (talk) 20:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Motorsports in the "typical examples" section.[edit]

We don't need formula 1 referenced 4 times, the only motorsports refs should be breaking G-force, and Kenny Braeck's crash. The Verstappen/Hamilton incident is clearly inflammatory if you're a fan of the sport, and the Grosjean example is superfluous. Perhaps the V8 example is 'good enough', but I stand by removing the two formula one crash references. Ruby.Boulton (talk) 02:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article does not proceed logically[edit]

In many places, this article jumps around from concept to concept, perhaps following the train of associations in the mind of a writer. This has led to inconsistent terminology, inconsistent logic, and difficult reading.

The slight helpfulness of knowing which topics are related in an author's mind doesn't seem worth it in this case. TooManyFingers (talk) 19:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs improvement[edit]

Should that banner thing at the top of the page that says "This article doesn't meet the standards for Wikipedia" or whatever be at the top? Theres 2 sections without any citations, and multiple needed citations Smirkjuice (talk) 23:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]