Talk:List of companies of Ukraine

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

List of the biggest companies of Ukraine was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 11 October 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of companies of Ukraine. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/List of Ukrainian companies. The consensus was to keep it. dbenbenn | talk 16:48, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Help, it kinda looks quite stubby.....

Companies, not TMs[edit]

Some of the entries listed are indeed brand names, not company names.

Or, and scrap this crappy list at all: Ukraine is a HUGE economy with dozens of thousands of companies. Are you people going to list them all or wut? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.133.136.147 (talk) 06:34, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List cleaned[edit]

I have cleaned this list of non-notable companies; this includes companies with no Wikipedia article and no satisfactory third party claim to notability. This is in line with the Manual of Style guidance for lists and notability guidelines. Remember that Wikipedia is not a directory - listing all companies is not necessarily useful. Before you add a new companies please ensure they meet the relevant notability guidelines, supported by reliable sources. In general it is best if the company has a Wikipedia page (on which notability is established) before it is added.

--Errant Tmorton166^(Talk) 20:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To be deleted[edit]

I'm afraid his article is either non-neutral (as it pretends to list only "notable" companies meeting unspecified criteria) or a list that is doomed to be never completed. The latter is more obvious since we have millions of companies in this country:). I suggest we reform it to less speculative lists (such as "list of largest companies by ..." or Ukrainian stock exchange lists). Anyway, I'm going to AfD this page in awhile as it is being intensively used as a SEO drive. Ukrained (talk) 22:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alas, as much as I would love to remove these little spam magnets, they are almost always kept at AFDs. The criteria for inclusion usually used is that which is indicated in the section directly above; an existing article on the topic. A stock exchange list is not possible to keep up with, nor does it really indicate notability of the firms on the list (see WP:LISTED). A hybrid list, such as the one at List of companies of India, which shows globally ranking firms is certainly possible if you have some suggestions. As for the tagging; I'm not sure what the "why" tags are for - are you confused about inclusion criteria or the comments after each entry? Kuru (talk) 00:20, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusion criteria, of course. We desperateluy need to discuss and formalize them. Otherwise, let's dedicate ourselves to neverending manual spam-filtering:( Ukrained (talk) 02:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that even the most stringent inclusion criteria will still require manual spam filtering. It does tend to limit the amount of wikilawyering with the spammers, though. As noted above and in my previous rely, the most common method is notability by way of an established article on wikipedia. This is fairly concrete, and additions to the list can be scrutinized for "SEO articles" when they are added. Do you have an alternative? Kuru (talk) 12:18, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With no response in four months, I presume that you're comfortable with the inclusion criteria proposed. Kuru (talk) 01:25, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing the reason for the "clarification needed" tags on the section titles. Can you expand on the reason for adding these or propose alternatives? Kuru (talk) 01:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrbud[edit]

Ukrbud [uk] is missing. First someone interested should create an English-language equivalent of the Ukrainian-language article. Boud (talk) 16:18, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]