Talk:Hugh II of Jaffa

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Middle Ages: Crusades C‑class Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

rumoured or rumored[edit]

Webster 1913 has it as rumored as did my spell checker. --Stbalbach 03:28, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Well, that's the American spelling... Adam Bishop 05:46, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

yeah.. I just downloaded an English (England) dictionary for my forms window spell checker. Stbalbach 03:00, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

ordinal[edit]

Someone has made a very unfortunate decision when titling this article as Hugh II of Le Puiset.

He shuld be either Hugh II of Jaffa or Hugh III of Le Puiset.

They did not themselves use ordinals, so that's nothing to be found in original sources.

Genealogist use of these artificial ordnals is for the sole purpose of keeping persons distinct ffrom each other.

Now, as someone has named this precisely the same as can be used about his own father, the very only reason for the ordinal is gravely compromised.

The outcome could be a confusion of facts who of these two did and was what.

Retitling is needed. 62.78.106.28 16:07, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I was considering putting this under Hugh II of Jaffa instead. He's not Hugh III of Le Puiset, that's another person, so that's not going to work. As you say, his father was Hugh II of Le Puiset itself, but sources (secondary works of course) often number them as I and II in the sense that they are the "Le Puiset counts of Jaffa." I tried to explain this in the article. It is pretty likely that someone would search for "Hugh II of Le Puiset" when looking for this guy, because he is called that; on the other hand, there is a Wikipedia tradition to use the highest title, which is of course Jaffa. Adam Bishop 16:36, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)