Talk:Foča

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Foča article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Bosnia and Herzegovina

	Bosnia and Herzegovina portal Foča is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Moved to Foca following the BiH Supreme Court decision, see [1] [2] [3]. GeneralPatton 07:10, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Citations given - and deleted[edit]

I added citation for the camps and rapes. Someone deleted them. I am reinstating them. The ICTY is a reliable source.--Barend 19:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? ICTY is reliable source? ROFL. The court which for ex prosectutor Carla Del Ponte and many others said it's so false and full of presure and hypocrisy? The court which had liberated Naser Oric who had killed 3 500 Serbs and let free Ramush Haradinai no matter all the witnesses were killed before they have come to the court? Now they start case again. LOL. After all the court which said all the evidency of Serb organ trafikking by Hashim Tachi to be hidden? Thank you mr.Dick Marty to prove it! Be serious and clean this thread! Delete those lies about revange during WW2 to Muslim women for what Croatian Ustashas did. Com on, com on. Please! 109.93.0.71 (talk) 01:51, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

“Rep.Srpska” history section cleansing[edit]

I was just checking the revision history of this page and detected a massive deletion of the “History” section made by someone called “Rep.Srpska”. The guy made a basic “ethnic cleansing” of the past of this city during World War II (omitting battles between the chetniks and partisans and the monument to the latter) and the Bosnian War (omitting all the dark pages of the sons-of-a-Mladich) and adding a lot of Serb Orthodox church images to the gallery.

Very typical for an extremist.

I’ll correct this, re-adding the lost information and putting something more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.13.104.95 (talk) 19:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I redid and reverted large portions of vandalism by 91.191.14.179. Seems to be an ongoing thing.Lisaveta (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

Number of 8000 muslims killed by chetniks is exaggerated.8000 is wrong reference.You should also mention Serbs murdered by Bosniak ustasha. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.91.1.45 (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article is massively POV and needs to be redone by a more neutral party.(Saint78 (talk) 12:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Kragujevac city Coat of Arms.jpg[edit]

The image File:Kragujevac city Coat of Arms.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --16:55, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done I've removed this image. It wasn't really making any significant contribution to the article anyway. Marek.69 ^talk 17:25, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Religions of Foca?[edit]

How can you talk about religions of Foča and reference the number of members of a certain nationality (such as Serbs, Croats, ...). Nationality is not a religion. You could write, Orthodox, Catholic Christian, but not "Croat" or "Serb". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.64.27.9 (talk) 07:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]