Talk:Lionel Robbins

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.

Cleanup[edit]

I submitted this article to cleanup, because it contained an unwikified text dump by some anon. I haven't verified the info in dump nor checked it for copyvios. jni 13:29, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page basically copies the New School bio of Robbins. (See http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/robbins.htm).

Cheers

opposed vs. influenced[edit]

It's not clear what "opposed" means in the infobox. As best I can tell, it embodies the complex idea that Robbins' work lead to different conclusions for specific result(s). Instead of characterizing this as "opposed", I've just moved this into "influences". If there is a reference that states he was explicitly opposed to Marshall and his economics in geneeral, then I suppose we can move it back. aprock (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]