Talk:Imaginary Heroes

Fair use rationale for Image:Imaginary Heroes (poster).jpg

Image:Imaginary Heroes (poster).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot

After reviewing the changes to the plot, I feel that the previous version was better, for a few reasons. First, the new plot was in second person (it used "you"), which is generally unacceptable in Wikipedia articles (see MOS:YOU). Second, it included a lot of details, like direct quotes, that go beyond the level of necessary detail for plot summaries. It was especially odd to me because some scenes were explained in very high detail, while others where done in overview style. Overall, we want a broad summary of the movie, not individual lines or points. While the current summary isn't perfect either, I thought it was better than the altered version. I'll try to copy edit it in a bit. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why isn't the ending mentioned? Use some spoiler tags, and give an actual synopsis. I haven't seen this movie. Could someone who has provide the plot of the rest of the film? It's too ambiguous.El erico (talk) 00:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We don't use spoiler tags, but, yes, the full plot should be given. I haven't seen the movie itself, so I'm no help there, but anyone else is certainly welcome to take a stab at it. I will happily copy-edit afterward if anyone needs help. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My is Williams cut from starring?

Clearly billed by the film as one of the leading roles, and sharing their screen time, why has this article incoherently chosen to cut Michelle Williams from the article data of starring cast?

Arcsoda (talk) 04:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]