Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bulgaria/archive1

Bulgaria

Well written and informitive article. Includes images, summeries of sub articles etc.

---

Not an objection. But I the article (I think) is below the standards that is expected of country articles. 1) The introduction can be much better/long 2) The Regions list should be shortened 3) More external links needed 4) Write a culture section introduction 5) Add more sections, _at least_ a Transportation and Foreign Relations. Just something you may want to consider... Perhaps you may like to go to Wikipedia:Peer Review ? Squash 06:07, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

• Object. Agree with squash. This article is lacking content on nearly all fronts, has no photos, no references, and the regions map has way too much whitespace. Jeronimo 08:02, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Object. Although the current sections are well written, it lacks more topics such as sports, culture et al. For more information checking if what is required for a country to be a FA why don't u look at the countries that are now FA's viz- Belgium, PRC China, India? Nichalp 10:33, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Object. Good article, but generally too short. History section should be expanded, for example. Phils 17:44, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• (from poster)Ya okay, I looked at the other country articles, remove this. I'll expand it then I'll re-candidate it.
• Object. Instead try nominationg History of Bulgaria, which looks fairly complete and is well-illustrated (although references are needed). --mav 04:59, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)