Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entergy Corporation

Entergy Corporation was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep

Entergy Corporation[edit]

An energy company -- could be less known than Enron. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk)]] 20:13, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Keep -- yes, this article was created as a stub and has sat there untouched for awhile now. But its an interesting corporation (with recent developments worth mentioning -- i.e. it sold its derivatives trading business to Merrill Lynch on November 1, 2004). I'll work on it over the next couple of days and try to make something trans-stubbly out of it. --Christofurio 20:18, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Cheers to Christofurio, and obvious keep for a Fortune 500 company with a "fleet" of nuclear power plants. The owner of a nuclear plant is notable. :p Samaritan 21:23, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep'. However, needs expansion. Notable on Google. --Randy 23:10, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep and allow for organic growth. [[User:GRider|GRider\^talk]] 23:49, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep - yes, they're not as notable as Enron, but they're notable noetheless. -Sean Curtin 00:49, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Financially bigger than many countries. Work needed, I notice that cleanup was tried for a few minutes only. From the above it looks well under control now, and would be a keeper anyway. Andrewa 00:53, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep it. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 01:45, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep: DCEdwards1966 04:38, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)
Is the listing a joke? — David Remahl 10:25, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.