Wikipedia:Peer review/Dae Jang-gum/archive1

I have read this article and proposed some improvement:

Add the full content of the drama in a new article.
Open a new article: Dae Jang-gum Fever, to describe how this drama affects Japan, ROK, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Chicago.

Is it OK? --Cheung1303 03:17, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The second new article you suggest sounds very interesting and worthwhile! I'm not so sure about the first one, it might be considered "fancruft". But the purpose of peer review is to bring articles up to Featured standard (see instructions on this page). Dae Jang-gum is too short for that, and the new articles you propose wouldn't take it any closer to Featured standard, since they're not changes to the article itself. Seems to me that your questions would go better on the article's talk page than on peer review—you would probably get more response there. Would you like to make your suggestions on Talk:Dae Jang-gum instead? Or just Be bold, go ahead and create the new articles! Bishonen | Talk 17:55, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Cheung, since I know you never respond to comments, I will move your suggestions to Talk:Dae Jang-gum myself. Bishonen | Talk 00:57, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)