User talk:IlyaHaykinson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

DPL Bugs on WikiArquitectura.com[edit]

To the responsible of DPL extension,

My name is Guillermo (guillermo@wikiarquitectura.com) and I’m responsible for several Wikis, the most important of them www.wikiarquitectura.com. Which runs both in Spanish and English.

I was trying to install your extension on the Spanish version of WikiArquitectura in order to show some ads and I’m finding some problems.

I first installed the extension on another wiki I use for testing (www.wikipremiere.com) this Wiki is also in Spanish and runs MediaWiki 1.13.3. Everything went well here as you can see: http://es.wikipremiere.com/index.php?title=Sandbox

So I went ahead and installed the extension on WikiArquitectura, which runs MediaWiki 1.15.1 . But something is bugging here as you can see: http://es.wikiarquitectura.com/index.php?title=Sandbox

I did some testing, reinstalling, etc. I also commented the problem with some colleagues, but none of us was able to figure out what’s going wrong… Changing the variable $wgDBmysql5 from true to false on the LocalSettings.php solves the problem and DPL runs then correctly, but that messes up all the special Spanish characters of the site, changing them for some piece of code instead of showing the character…

I’m running out of ideas here… so I decided to contact you to see if you have any idea how to solve this… maybe you’ve found this problem earlier or something… My email is: guillermo@wikiarquitectura.com

Thank you very much for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.36.55.225 (talk) 12:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Miami - Knight Foundation project[edit]

I am currently working on a Knight Foundation proposal for Wikipedia and Wikinews. If I've asked you to join me in a chat and you can't make it, or if you have any comments or questions about the proposal or the process, please leave some comments below. -- IlyaHaykinson 04:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will be working at 12 noon on Saturday, but I will be home by 2 pm or maybe a bit later, when is the later repeat chat scheduled? -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 04:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, i work 5-1:30 on Saturday and Sunday so those won't work either. Well... I'm interested in it, we'll see what happens. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 13:14, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We could coordinate a personal chat, how did the last ones go, btw? -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 15:25, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Monday evening works fine for me, or Tuesday. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 15:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good to me, just gimme a screename and messaging service... you can e-mail this to me if preffered. -- SmthManly / ManlyTalk / ManlyContribs 02:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on List of Medical Clearinghouses, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DGG (talk) 01:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

dpl for "Index (List of index-terms) for a book"[edit]

Hello IlyaHaykinson,

I have put a question on the talk page of dpl: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension_talk:DynamicPageList#Index_.28List_of_index-terms.29_for_a_book

Are you able to give me some hints there?

Regards,Jan-- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.52.190.71 (talk) 10:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Thats My Mountain Wilson Toll Road!!![edit]

I am the original editor of the Mt. Wilson Toll Road as listed on Wikipedia. The story as it was submitted is the story I tell of the Mount Wilson Toll Road in any of my lectures on Altadena history or talk on the Mount Lowe Railway, another of my original edits. I have never heard of Old Radio.com nor of Benjamin's Mountain. If anyone is plagiarizing, they are. I find my Wikipedia articles all over tell-all web sites. And all those photos are from my collection of Altadena photos. I am a recognized Altadena historian, and that road is damned near in my back yard. It's story is somewhat relative to the story of the Mount Lowe Railway, and those accounts on WP are mine. They come from a myriad of historical tales in Altadena, some published, and some lore. I request that the original text be reinstated. Understanding that WP articles become a matter of public domain, I find it small wonder that irrefutable tales like mine might be lifted and copyrighted on another site. Thank you.--Magi Media (talk) 22:04, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of Dynamic Pagelist x Semantic Mediawiki[edit]

I have startet a "Comparison of Dynamic Pagelist x Semantic Mediawiki". Please help to improve the comparison and add some information: Comparison of Dynamic Pagelist x Semantic Mediawiki --Jannis, 87.186.25.106 (talk) 13:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Research survey invitation[edit]

Greetings IlyaHaykinson-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 04:02, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, IlyaHaykinson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, IlyaHaykinson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, IlyaHaykinson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does DPL2 have support for Actor Migration?[edit]

Hi, does DPL2/third-party have support for Actor Migration required for MediaWiki 1.35? Or does it suffer from the same issues as DPL3 which is now labeled as incompatible with the current version of MediaWiki? Please see explanation [Extension_talk:DynamicPageList_(third-party)#Is_this_compatible_with_1.35_or_does_it_have_the_same_issues_as_DPL3%3F here]. Sorry to be a pest, we have several sites reliant on DPL3 and are looking to switch to DPL2, but see that many of the same maintainers are on both projects, and possibly it suffers from the same issue, so thought I would ask. Cheers. TiltedCerebellum (talk) 01:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DPL2/third-party and DPL3 incompatible with MW 1.35 LTS[edit]

Hi, I'm not exactly sure the best way to get in contact with the team working on DPL2 and DPL3 (I see you listed on both, and several overlapping members on each extension's page). At current both DPL2/third-party and DPL3 have been flagged as incompatible with MediaWiki 1.35 (LTS) due to lack of actor support (see: T267824 and T6402), causing database errors and as such has been flagged as incompatible on the extension page and not recommended for use on production wikis. We decided to switch back to DPL2 from DPL3 for testing, then discovered that DPL built-in variables also no longer work in surrogate/phantom templates under MediaWiki 1.35. We get the literal text output for the %PAGE% and other built-in variables, instead of the value of those variables as documented. We rely fairly heavily on surrogate/phantom templates to retrieve template parameter values, in combination with built-in dpl variables and parser functions and I see on wikiapiary there are about 600 wiki currently using DPL2/3. We're trying to determine if we need to stay at 3.33, or downgrade to 3.31 LTS in lieu of the current LTS not being supported. Is there any way that users can donate to the project in the hopes of an update for compatibility with the current release of MediaWiki? Or can someone lend insight as to if there are plans to continue maintaining the extension? Thanks! TiltedCerebellum (talk) 04:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I haven't worked on that extension for over a decade. I'm afraid I don't know the answer to your question. -- IlyaHaykinson (talk) 18:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]