User talk:Kudz75

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here are some links I find useful

Cheers, Sam [Spade] 03:24, 19 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there, about your edits in Prussia under Teutonic rule:

  • Teutons weren;'t ruling Pommerania as fief. The exact wording of the treaty was that they receive it as an "alm" from Polish king, which because of being not too clear made basis for further legal disputes (for example it meant that Teutons ackonwledged, that their have no earlier legal basis - sicne they received land as "alm", then it means that they recognised that Polish kings had rights to Pomerania, and also thay they should behave properly to men who gave them the alm).
  • That Wenceslaus gave Pommerania for Meissen is not disputed. However contract was not made, because Wenceslaus never

received Meissen.

  • The massacre in Danzig/Gdansk is not based on stagnation in Gdansk, but on contemporary sources as well (it was brought

to papal trial by Ladislaus the Short.

My English is too bad to find proper wording, but i would be most gratefull if you will correct the informations.

This is better addressed at Talk:Prussia under the Teutonic Order --kudz75 02:12, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Nice work on Kokoda Track. Any change of finding a good public domain picture? Crown copyright lasts 50 years in Australia so everything from the battle should now be public domain. Gdr 11:45, 2004 Oct 25 (UTC)

You can see at [1] that copyright lasts for 50 years from the making for "Artistic works (other than engravings and other prints) in which the Crown owns copyright". If the artist was an official war artist the the Crown will own the copyright and if made before 1954 then it has expired. It wouldn't do any harm to ask the AWM for details of the copyright for the painting. Gdr 00:17, 2004 Oct 26 (UTC)

(Comment moved to Talk:Italian Plague of 1629-1631)

TDC TLC[edit]

Just noticed your TDC page. Thanks. It fixes a couple of red links I've left, & gives me a photo (I've never actually seen one). Trekphiler 19:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart meetup[edit]

Hello! This is a message to inform you of a Wikipedia Hobart meetup which will be held on 10 January. New and experienced editors are welcome! Please check the meetup page for more information.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Hobart by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart area articles[edit]

Hello, in advance of a possible project in the Hobart area, we're looking to identify and improve a specific range of articles, mainly those associated with locations in the Hobart City Council region. If you'd like to find out more, please join in the discussion at WikiProject Tasmania, or check out the list of articles at QR list. If you'd prefer to not receive these notifications in the future, please let me know.

This message has been sent to members of Category:Wikipedians in Tasmania, Category:Wikipedians in Hobart, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Tasmania participants by Chuq (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]