User talk:ObjectiveBrit

Welcome!

Hello, ObjectiveBrit, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Alai 19:54, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

World News Tonight[edit]

I think that the World News Tonight link should link to ABC World News Tonight, since it's the most common use of it. It is actually the ABC News nightly newscast. -- SNIyer12 21:20, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Objectivism WikiProject[edit]

[Per discussion on Al's Talk page. Please feel free to refactor.--TJ 13:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)][reply]

Sign me up.--TJ 13:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have had an Objectivism Wiki up for several years at http://wiki.objectivismonline.net --GreedyCapitalist 14:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and salutations! I just stumbled across your project and I am very excited about it. Although, I'm more than well aware of the "fall out" (had my own clashes with Al), and the bitter Tirades that ensues from them that just don't get it. I am a friend of Yaron Brooks, as well as a few others Notable Objectivist. I hope I can offer some assistance and learn more along the way. I look forward to hearing from you and getting some direction. Mystar 21:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sky News/Horrocks comments[edit]

Yeah I suppose the anon IP blanking should have been checked a bit - it is difficult with anon's, some are pure vandals, some have malicious intent, some are innocently making changes and some are actually decent editors who (for whatever reason) want to remain as IP no's. The problem with the story to begin with is that it was a leaked email, so Mr Horrocks himself isn't going to be clarifying his comments! The context of the email is with respect to Ian Blair, so I agree that it is too much of a jump to state that news outlets are using sky news (facts are that is unlikely anyway, the AP/BBC/Reuters newswires are still the dominant source for outlets, the sky news footprint is pretty small in comparison). SFC9394 15:42, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

objectivism wiki[edit]

If you like I set up a wiki for objectivism here that you can take control of:

http://www.editthis.info/objectivism/

(another) objectivist wiki[edit]

I'd like to invite you to come help me establish [1]. Since you set up the wikiproject here on Objectivism, I'd be more then happy to give you SySop rights there so you can edit the main page, and protected pages (we've had a lot of vandalism). I along with User:GreedyCapitalist want to get this project off that ground.

Hope to hear from you. Crazynas 13:56, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Classic pop"[edit]

I notice that you've moved the page (originally created by me) on "Traditional pop music" to "Classic pop." I really don't want to have an edit war going on, so before moving it back I want to discuss this with you.

Before I created the article, I discussed the title with others; there is, certainly, no common name universally used for this kind of music. "Traditional pop" does have the point in its favor that the All Music Guide uses this term, and the AMG seems to be considered an important reference work.

I particularly dislike "Classic pop" because it sounds a bit like an oxymoron ("Classic" is too close to "classical" in my mind!) and also because many radio stations call their format "classic rock" (an altogether different type of music!)

Is there a reason you prefer the title you've chosen? -- BRG 13:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BRG,

I didn't move the article as such - there were actually two seperate articles, one called Classic pop and one called Traditional pop, discussing the same basic "genre"/style of music. The article on Classic pop had significantly more information, so I merged Traditional pop into it. I've no objection whatsoever to Traditional pop being the overall title, so if that's the consensus feel free to change it :-) --Matthew Humphreys 15:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CGN[edit]

Never knew Classic Gold Network Limited has been sold off (well partially you say), although both our local One Network licencee, Marcher Sound and Classic Gold station, Classic Gold Marcher are broadcast from the same place. Is it just a corporate thing then, and doesn't really affect the stations themselves - and how come GCap stil has 20% (or was that inherited by Capital Radio)? Just out of interest Marbles333 18:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your work has not gone unappreciated[edit]

WikiProject Objectivism
Salutations, ObjectiveBrit. I notice you were once a participant in the inactive WikiProject Objectivism and I am excited to inform you that I have resuscitated the project. I was not active in the original project, so your experience and ideas would be most valuable. If you're interested in taking part, please consider changing your inactive status in the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage.

Yours in enlightened self-interest, Skomorokh 00:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shortcuts

Atlas Shrugged Article[edit]

Hello! As a member of Wiki Project Objectivism would you please see my post on the excessive coverage of fictional technology, etc. in Atlas Shrugged and my proposal to replace it with more coverage of the meaning of the events in that novel. Thanks. —Blanchette (talk) 03:36, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Objectivism[edit]

I am clearing the participant list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Objectivism due to inactivity. Please add yourself again if you want to participate. --Karbinski (talk) 22:13, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject British TV channels[edit]

This is a message from Wikiproject British TV channels. Please visit the main project page to reconfirm if you are actively taking part in the project and update your details. Many thanks. Auntie Beeb (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Curzon Cinemas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Curzon Cinemas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. RadioFan (talk) 18:36, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WiciBrosiect Cymru[edit]

Ymunwch gyda WiciBrosiect Cymru os gwelwch yn dda! Diolch Titus Gold (talk) 21:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]