User talk:3vruna

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. While we very much appreciate your additions, and I don't want to discourage you in any way, a lot of the information you've added on RuneScape does not belong in an encyclopedia. The content you've added belongs on a fan page with summaries being on here. If you could summarise things that would be great - for example, the list of people that worked on the game could be cut down to a few sentences about the main people behind it. I hope this helps you understand why I removed the content. violet/riga (t) 23:30, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Just so you know I've changed the RuneScape 2 and RuneScape Classic articles into redirects - anybody typing them in now will be taken to the main RuneScape article. If, in the future, you (or someone else) wants to expand them into articles in their own right with information specific to those games then that's easy enough. Good luck with the summaries. violet/riga (t) 23:39, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)

VFD

I understand you disagree with the way the votes are going in the vfd listing of Rune Mysteries. However, retaliatory listing of all these articles is not the appropriate way of handling this situation. Gamaliel 02:07, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Please read my final comment. These are not 'retaliatory', it is too end the wasting of people time who create fancruft and of the people whoe try to delete it. I reccomend finding example of fancruft that need to be deleted so all this can better resolved. 3vruna 02:13, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Uhh, but why did you create all of the deletion articles as redirects to a nonexistent vfd debate? I'm confused here, and this is going to take a while to clean up. Before I get into it, was there any reason that you did this, or was it just to prove a WP:POINT? --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 15:26, July 11, 2005 (UTC)