Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robot Master

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Korath (Talk) 03:19, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

Robot Master[edit]

This is gamecruft at it's worst. It needs to be deleted before the obsessive inclusionists try to add more junk into it. C-list actor 02:56, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • No vote. Note that User:C-list actor has tried the "Army of Obvious Sockpuppets" approach with Goomba. android↔talk 02:58, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. I think C-List Actor didn't put this on VfD for the reasons VfD should be used, but instead to cause disruption, clear by sockpuppets on Goomba. Hedley 03:06, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • C-List Actor was just blocked for sockpuppeting VfDs. On the basis that this VfD was never properly formed (Robot Master was never given a VfD tag), I think it should be closed. Hedley 03:13, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
      • I heartily agree. Leave the article at least until someone has a valid nom. And if anything can be done about his hoard of socks, that should be done, as well. --InShaneee 03:19, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. User who put this vote up for deletion uses sock puppets. Also, same reasons as why I voted to keep Goomba. Andrew pmk 06:01, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete or merge into Mega Man. This is fancruft that is not encyclopedic on its own. Martg76 07:51, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep, malformed VfD, trolling. Xezbeth 07:54, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. I slapped on a vfd-tag since articles on the vfd page should have one whether or not the nomination was in good or bad faith. Oh yes... the nomination is in my view ridiculous. Sjakkalle 11:44, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep see also the Goomba VfD for the whole story. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:22, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. At least it's better than having individual articles for every robot on the list! P Ingerson 14:11, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. At the very least such a list stops a whole bunch of useless stubs from being created. Also, the vfd was made in bad faith. Mgm|(talk) 14:21, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:FICT. Radiant_* 15:37, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. It may need a different name, though. Robot Master is not the first place I would look for a complete list of Mega Man bosses. Indrian 06:15, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep--Matteh (talk) 14:24, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep - KingTT 14:26, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete Bad faith or not, this is gamecruft --Bucephalus 17:59, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep or merge into Mega Man. Andre (talk) 18:04, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, more nn gamecruft, no potential to become encyclopedic. ComCat 06:33, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep. It's better to compress all robot masters into one article than for people to make 100 articles on each robot master. Nestea 15:52, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robot_Master&oldid=1138311111"