Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Evehema

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was - deleted

Dan Evehema

The page contains no useful information. A google search reveals lots of links with much the same religous "thoughts". I acknowledge that if this were written in a NPOV 3rd person perspective it could prove to be a worthy addition (I think Wikipedia can be ideal source for sifting through a lot of mumbo jumbo on the web). However I think it would be difficult to do. CheekyMonkey 09:48, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Bio-stub and give it time, then? Samaritan 11:38, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• What is it? The thing is so short that I can't tell whether this is an Indian or a fansite description. I can't tell anything about it, in fact, and I vote delete on the basis that it is such a radical substub that the contents cannot be expanded. The title might be, but not the subject. If all that is of worth in an article is its title, I think it's a delete, since the same "interested editor" who would expand such an article would also think of the subject. Geogre 16:29, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Abstain. He's some sort of Hopi religious leader. All I can find on him is some photos and an essay he wrote that seems to be somewhat popular. Oh, and some site using quotes from him about Hopi belief as evidence for alien visitors on Earth. — Gwalla | Talk 23:26, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Article does not establish notability. It is not incumbent on the rest of us to try to determine if an article is worth keeping, it is the responsibility of the person who writes the stub. RickK 23:42, Nov 14, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete unless micro-stub is expanded enuf to actually document 'human knowledge' (what, where, when, why, etc.). Niteowlneils 21:06, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete - whowhatnow? -- Cyrius|✎ 03:19, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• keep and expand, Hopi elders are more notable than the Bajoran wormhole, just needs more work, and note that it was written as a first-time attempt by a user who only wrote the one article.... and nobody welcomed the user or offered any help or guidance. Lets keep this and watch it grow. I'll fiddle with it a bit if we keep it. I think there are lots of editors here that can expand it. If everyone who reads this adds one sentence it won't be a stub any more.Pedant 06:46, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC)
  • If anyone who reads it adds one sentence, then it'll have one sentence. It's currently a borderline speedy deletion candidate for lack of context. -- Cyrius|✎ 12:36, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, no content - SimonP 05:32, Dec 3, 2004 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.