Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chung King Can Suck It

Chung King Can Suck It was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to redirect the article.

This needs a bit of work if it's staying. For a start, who's it by? Deb 18:00, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Redirect From searching on google I found out that it's made by Judge and I think that it's notable enough. But there is alreayd an article about it under the original name of the record (before it was scrapped) - Bringin' It Down.
Delete: What the hell? Again: encyclopedias answer questions, not pose them. Any article that forces us to go to Google to find out what the hell it's about is not an encyclopedia article. I do not believe it will be searched, nor that it would be worthy were it to be searched. Trivia about a minor league band belongs in the minor league band's article, but, frankly, I don't think the minor league bands should be here, either. Let them achieve success, either artistic or commercial, before someone calls them encyclopedic. Geogre 19:10, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Completely rewrite it, or maybe redirect to Bringin' It Down. A search indictaes this is notable, but there's nothing salvagable here. -R. fiend 20:39, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I've redirected it to Bringin' It Down and expanded that article to more fully explain this. -R. fiend 21:06, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  - Nice work. The current article at Bringin' It Down is clear and establishes notability. Isomorphic 22:53, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep as redirect. —siro χ o 05:55, Nov 10, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.