Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert W. Armstrong (index)

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:47, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert W. Armstrong (index)[edit]

Bizarre "see also" page. Some material might be merged into Herbert W. Armstrong, but the page should be deleted. —Ashley Y 09:34, 2005 May 19 (UTC)

Delete, inline links are there to be used, indexes are not necessary. --bainer 09:53, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge what can be salvaged, and then, reluctantly, Delete. I applaud the author's ambition to make what seems to them like a highly useful page, and it's well written and incredibly comprehensive to boot, but I'm afraid it's probably a misundestanding of wikification leading to a lot of unnecessary hard work. I'll say it again, it's an amazing effort. Master Thief Garrett 10:30, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It looks to me like a narrative form of "What Links Here." Duplicates a function of the software and increases page rank (even if that's not the author's desire). Geogre 11:30, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete -- we do not want to set a precedent of having indices for every page. Would make special:randompage very boring. Dunc|☺ 12:06, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
bewildering list better served by section on main article's page, so merge. I agree with MTG that it's a shame, though. Grutness...wha? 14:18, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article doesn't even try to explain how some of these things are related to Herbert W. Armstrong, this is a really bad precedent as well. Rick K 21:39, May 19, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, looks like a collection of links that doesnt really expalin the significance with Armstrong - not very useful. Megan1967 06:51, 20 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete —Ashley Y 08:17, 2005 May 20 (UTC)
Delete. -- Chowbok 14:55, May 20, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.