User talk:WriterHound

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, WriterHound, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  WLU 18:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image use[edit]

Please be careful about this sort of thing; these images are nonfree and their use is only really justifiable on the article about the album. Thanks, --John (talk) 19:41, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GNU isn't free?
WriterHound (talk) 21:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File:99.9F - Suzanne Vega.jpg is a nonfree (copyright) image. We can only use it here under a claim of fair use. --John (talk) 01:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, O.K. I thought you meant the picture of Tom's Restaurant, which had GNU on it.
WriterHound (talk) 02:50, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No, that one is totally fine. Image use is a minefield here; let me know if you have any other queries regarding it. --John (talk) 03:20, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Reserve[edit]

FYI, all members of the Board of Governors are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Terms are 14 years. For vacated appointments, new appointees fill the remaining time of the original 14 year appointment. Not sure why you wrote that Governors are "partially" appointed by the President. Reconfirmer444 (talk) 01:39, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for catching that. Sorry, I became confused later in the article by the FOMC, which it says is partially (7/12) appointed by the president.
WriterHound (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed your helpful work at Marfan syndrome. Good links to read when working on medical articles are WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS. Good luck! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:39, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!
WriterHound (talk) 20:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response and review article at my talk page, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you added an AfD notice to this page, but from your edits I couldn't find a matching AfD debate. The one linked to was from 2007. If you think there are issues with the article, could you please debate them on the talk page before renominating the page. Thanks, Verbal chat 19:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Denialism[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Denialism, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denialism (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

Service awards proposal[edit]

Master Editor Hello, WriterHound! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 04:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced[edit]

Hi WriterHound! You added some content to Hearing impairment without adding any sources. Please, always add sources, especially in medical articles or sections. Thank you! Lova Falk talk 17:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sorry. I did read the info previously, though. Thanks for your nice work on the article!
WriterHound (talk) 19:36, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:57, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

looks good[edit]

your edit is accurate, thanks. -Shootbamboo (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:29, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Chernobyl disaster[edit]

Flags in infoboxes are deprecated; see WP:MOSFLAG. --John (talk) 07:34, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!
WriterHound (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation for a short research survey[edit]

Hi, I am a PhD student at Carnegie Mellon University doing some research into editing and reverts on Wikipedia. I am looking for editors who have done some editing to Genetics articles on Wikipedia in the past as participants in a short survey. The survey will take about 10-15 minutes, and will help me model what sorts of things are reverted on Wikipedia so that I can develop interfaces and tools for newcomers and administrators. If you would like to participate, please complete the survey on SurveyMonkey here. You can find out more about me on my user page and personal home page. I'm more than happy to talk more about this research on my talk page, and thank you for your time. JeffRz (talk) 19:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

The Cleanup Barnstar
Thanks for your work on Medical cannabis! Alfie↑↓© 12:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! WriterHound (talk) 19:37, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Hemp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wu Di (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted![edit]

Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 01:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)|}[reply]


Per the above please use secondary sources. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 06:34, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SIG Sauer P238, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MSRP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:23, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Breast cancer - cannabis[edit]

Hi. I noticed your edits to Breast cancer, Male breast cancer and Breast cancer treatment were reverted. Just to let you know, we don't as a rule include in vitro results in overview articles like those. For such articles we generally rely on sources that conform to this guideline: WP:MEDRS; essentially, reviews, textbooks and scholarly or professional guidelines or position statements. Those findings may be appropriate for a more focussed article such as Frontiers in breast cancer research or the like, provided it has been evaluated and put in context by a WP:MEDRS-compliant source. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 11:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! WriterHound (talk) 11:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SIG 516, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Semi-automatic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bisphenol A, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of incidents of cannibalism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Māori and Northland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment[edit]

Peak oil, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Beagel (talk) 18:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account[edit]

Hi WriterHound! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Vachellia farnesiana var. farnesiana—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 86.83.56.115 (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers, Leo