Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRACKING

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 00:33, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CRACKING[edit]

Unencyclopaedic topic, designed to try and promote an unknown, and uncared about person62.254.0.38 07:49, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This was originally nominated together with James Martin (DJ). See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/James Martin (DJ). --MarkSweep 16:55, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Longhair | Talk 07:59, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable. Megan1967 08:31, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pointless neologism. Nestea 11:22, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an unencyclopedic topic. Verifiability is also questionable. --MarkSweep 16:55, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to a page about cracking of software. Meelar (talk) 20:56, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Part of a larger vandalism, and ironically, so is this nomination! But unlike the article, this nomination has something to recommend it. Both are personal attacks, and the perpetrators are in dire danger of blocks and bans. Redirect is pointless, owing to the irregular capitalisation. Andrewa 21:01, 3 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to cracking. -Sean Curtin 00:15, May 5, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.