User talk:WikiWikiPhil

Welcome![edit]

Hi WikiWikiPhil! My name's Nathaniel, but I go by the username Spangineer around here. I hope you enjoy editing wikipedia and that you stick around – your edits to 3M are greatly appreciated. If you have any questions about anything related to wikipedia, just let me know – go to my talk page, hit the plus sign (+) next to "edit this page" at the top and leave me a note. You can sign your name after you're done by typing ~~~~. A few links you might find useful include: Tutorial, Manual of Style, Community Portal, Policy Library and perhaps most importantly, the Sandbox, where you can just play around and try different things. Have a great day, and again, any questions, just let me know! Happy editing! Spangineer ∞ 21:01, May 1, 2005 (UTC)

Old Red Museum[edit]

A tag has been placed on Old Red Museum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Blanchardb (talk) 23:12, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Google map link[edit]

Thank you for edit. I've been going crazy trying to figure out what was happening and how to fix it Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Canon Digital SLR[edit]

Both cameras don't come out until next quarter (and I don't think the table is talking about fiscal years) so it is wrong to say the cameras came out in Q1. Marcus Qwertyus 19:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed about the D1X, but the 5D3 "is expected to be available at the end of March 2012", according to the press release. I'm not talking about fiscal years, just simple quarterly subdivisions. "the end of March 2012" is in Q1, no?

Oh. I didn't notice you didn't revert my change to the 1 DX date. Marcus Qwertyus 22:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rebel T4i processor[edit]

I notice you reverted my change on the 650D/T4i processor. I've put up a post on the template talk page referencing Canon U.S.A. press releases showing that the T4i has DIGIC 5 instead of DIGIC 5+. The DIGIC article notes that DIGIC 5 has previously been used on several Canon compact cameras; however, this is the first time DIGIC 5 (as opposed to DIGIC 5+) has appeared in a Canon DSLR. — Dale Arnett (talk) 04:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dale, I didn't revert your change, rather I combined both the 5 and 5+ together, then commented on the merge here: [1]. I also explained in the edit summary "Rename and combine DIGIC 5+ to DIGIC 5 in groupings." As you've identified, there are cameras with the two different processors, so my question from the Talk page is; what's the difference between the 5 and the 5+? The template has a limited space for fine details, so I think adding a new separate processor type shouldn't be done lightly. If you look back through the Template history, you'll see that I added the processor types as a replacement for a single bgcolor "video capable" feature, which didn't seem popular and effectively only showed which cameras were introduced after 2008. The nice thing about showing the DIGIC versions across the whole basic -> pro models is the feature progression over time. I hope this explains the edits I made; please contribute your opinions on the DIGIC 5/5+ distinction on the Talk page. WikiWikiPhil (talk) 21:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: King Gary (December 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Darren-M was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Note: declined under closest match for specific-notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:King Gary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:King Gary, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Darren-M talk 13:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiWikiPhil! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Darren-M talk 13:42, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:King Gary[edit]

Hello, WikiWikiPhil. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:King Gary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]