User talk:Inkypaws

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

/Archive1

EZ Message™ (Add a new topic)


Test[edit]

Test--inksT 22:46, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asperger's Updates[edit]

Absolutely, www.aspergers.com for starters. I can grab you more references if you like. I actually HAVE Asperger's and have both clinical depression and OCD along with it so there's that as well.

Edit:

Here are two specific links:

http://www.aspergers.com/aspcomor.htm http://www.aspergers.ca/syndrome/WhatisAS.html (See "Associated Challenges" section)

I don't know how much you know about AS, but the conditions I listed are essentially just very pronounced instances of the main symptoms that make up AS. The OCD is an extension of the love of routine and structure as well as the repetetive motions (especially of the hands). The main article already included talk of how children with AS tend to oppose authority. The Oppositional disorder is an extension of that. Each one of the conditions (depression aside) has a direct corollary with other symptoms. The depression most likely stems from the feeling of detachment us Aspies tend to experienced. But yeah, all of the things I added to the article are 100% verifiable. Two links provided above and I can grab more if you need them.

Thank you for the information - I have done some prelimenary searching on Pubmed, and I can't find much published material that does any more than spectulate about a causal link or correlation between AS and the conditions you describe. It is not enough that someone with AS also show some features of depression to classify them as "depressed" - all of these are separate conditions in their own right, with their own criteria for diagnosis. It would be inaccurate to keep the article as it is - once I have done some more work, I will modify the additions with a caution that it is not strongly supported by peer-reviewed research. --inksT 19:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I reworded the section I added to be far more speculative than declarative. I hope it's more to your liking. (FossaFerox 05:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Joe Carr[edit]

Thank you. I've no idea what it all means, except that it boils down to shenanigans. ;-) SlimVirgin (talk) 04:45, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot may need fixing, your edit to it deleted most of the article and it nearly got deleted for pure vandalism. --- Lid 23:00, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa! (just checked diffs). I'm not running a bot, but it looks like I should have reverted both those IP edits instead of just the first one. Thanks for pointing that out. Looks like you did the lions share of vandalfighting on that page.--inksT 02:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pythagorean theorem[edit]

Just to let you know that while reverting vandalism in the Pythagorean theorem article, you also removed most the article's content, as shown by this diff. You may want to doublecheck if the same thing happened in any other revert you've been performing... Cheers, Schutz 08:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Thanks for the pointer :)--inksT 20:20, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, having taken another look I think it might be a problem with the Godmode.lite script...I think it might be time to use a different tool.--inksT 20:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Soviet Russia[edit]

Hi. I heard my friend in math class today talking about Family Guy and the quote "In Soviet Russia you don't drive the car, the car drives you" (or something to that extent). Then I saw your slight template on your user page, and I thought it was halarious. Is that where you got the idea from? Thanks, Kilo-Lima|(talk) 19:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cefepime: Ongoing Safety Review[edit]

Cefepime (marketed as Maxipime) Update of Ongoing Safety Review.

MedWatch logo MedWatch - The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program

Cefepime (marketed as Maxipime) Update of Ongoing Safety Review Audience: Infectious disease healthcare professionals FDA notified healthcare professionals that it has finished its analysis of a possible risk of higher death with cefepime, an antibiotic, following publication of a study that suggested a higher rate of death in patients treated with this drug, as compared to patients treated with similar drugs. FDA reviewed this study data and conducted additional analyses based on additional data, including data submitted by Bristol Meyers Squibb. FDA has determined that the data do not indicate a higher rate of death in cefepime-treated patients. Cefepime remains an appropriate therapy for its approved indications. FDA will continue to review the safety of cefepime. As part of this ongoing review, both FDA and Bristol Meyers Squib are conducting separate analyses of death potentially associated with cefepime, using hospital drug use data. The results of these analyses likely will be reported in approximately one year. Read the complete MedWatch 2009 Safety Summary, including links to the Update of Ongoing Safety Review and previous 2007 and 2008 MedWatch safety alerts, at:

http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm167427.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.246.238 (talk) 16:25, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Inkypaws. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Inkypaws. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of United Airlines Flight 3411 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Airlines Flight 3411 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Airlines Flight 3411 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Primefac (talk) 01:39, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Express Flight 3411 incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Breen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Inkypaws. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Inkypaws. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]