Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscus (general)

Priscus (general) was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 3 votes to delete, nominator's vote unclear, but not keep. Postdlf 02:44, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Priscus (general)

This substub is about Priscus, who already has a pretty good detailed article. "(general)" is a red herring: this is not about any general named Priscus. I bet it should be a speedy delete, but I'm not positive enough about the niceties to do that. Note: no redirect, either: who would look for "Priscus (general)"? and any minor general by that name — I know of none, but I wouldn't be surprised if there were one — should be redirected to another article altogether. — Bill 12:16, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. No content. P. Riis 16:25, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Article is about the wrong Priscus. The general was someone entirely different (see also Gibbon) and not especially noteworthy. —No-One Jones ^(m) 16:34, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. NeoJustin 04:34 Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.