User talk:Anthony/Shawn Mikula

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I direct you to the policy on user subpages, particularly the one noting that your userspace is not personal webspace. This page seems to have no purpose save for hosting content that has been deleted through process and that you personally think should exist. That is to say, it is a personal webpage. Could you please provide some explanation for why this page exists and how it fits in with the policies of Wikipedia? Snowspinner 15:23, Feb 7, 2005 (UTC)

I am collecting information which may be useful in creating or enhancing an article in the Wikipedia. I have no relation to Shawn Mikula so this is certainly not personal webspace. -anthony
I'm not sure why you are trying to recreate or enhance an article that has been deleted. Snowspinner 19:10, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)

It seems perfectly reasonable to me that someone might later be able to establish notability for this person, and that keeping it around with that end in mind is perfectly appropriate. I do not think this should be deleted. -- Jmabel | Talk 06:36, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

Fine. Maybe there's a case for undeletion. The way to make that case, however, was not to lie in getting it undeleted and then to recreate it against consesnsus. Snowspinner 13:09, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)

Old content was:

Shawn Mikula is a neuroscientist at the Johns Hopkins University, and known for his work on theoretical and anatomical neuroscience. Mikula was also the founder of the Mind-Brain Society; as of Aug 2004, he is the chair of that institution.

I agree with Jmabel - it seems reasonable to place content in his user space to hold it until he has time to enhance or improve it - Trödel|talk 21:26, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This isn't an issue of "enhancement." This is an issue of "The article was deleted by wide consensus and Anthony is recreating the article in his own personal userspace." This content will never move anywhere else - it can't, because it was deleted by massive consensus. There is no enhancement or improvement that can go on within the realm of policy. Snowspinner 21:38, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)
Just read through some history of this article - thanks - Trödel|talk 23:13, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)