Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pun'd

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:48, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Pun'd

A non-notable neologism. Delete. — JIP | Talk 04:23, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Comment: The author of the article removed the VfD notice. User:Feco has marked it for speedy deletion, but the author removed that notice too. User:JeremyA has restord it. If the article is speedy deleted, this VfD becomes invalid. — JIP | Talk 04:58, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete... yeah, anon IP keeps clearing vfd and speedy tags... I figure a VfD vote will draw enough attention to make sure it gets deleted. The article says Pun'd is a neologism created in Feb 2005 by some guy.... methinks non-encyclopedic vanity. Feco 05:07, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete it --nixie 05:14, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism. Megan1967 05:54, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. If it's better sourced, the author can try contributing it to Wiktionary. Rossami (talk) 05:56, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Charles Matthews 10:19, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. jni 11:21, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• You just been delet'd! Neologism, no reason to transwiki. Author was trying to refer to a segue but wound up riding a Segway. Barno 20:37, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. --Dcfleck 15:12, 2005 Apr 24 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.