Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Site On The Planet

Best Site On The Planet was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Non-notable website. Eric119 03:02, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• delete Non-notable, not to mention obvious vanity. [[User:Lachatdelarue|Lachatdelarue (talk)]] 03:26, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: Vanity, and it sure looks like it was copied directly from the site. Advertising and irrelevancy. Geogre 03:44, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Nothing worth saving here. jni 06:55, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity. utcursch 07:03, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete fvw 09:13, 2004 Nov 8 (UTC)
• A lot of trivia about someone's personal life. Get the flamethrower out to it. Anthony Appleyard 11:06, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete - total blatant self-promotion. Destroy it! Forgotmytea 13:28, 9 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Redirect to wikipedia or delete. Gamaliel 20:08, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete seems the obvious response. Shimgray 23:28, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Nominate for Wikipedia:Award for Most Indulgent Vanity (2004). JRM 23:34, 2004 Nov 8 (UTC) Please stop. If you continue to add invalid votes, you will be blocked from editing VfD. JRM 23:34, 2004 Nov 8 (UTC)

  JRM, you're too hard on yourself. :-) And, for all who didn't notice, you added both of those comments in a single edit. Eric119 06:21, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Delete. Oven Fresh 01:08, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.