Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindu rebuttal

Hindu rebuttal was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

• Page was created to house an argument for Talk:Idolatry, and the statement is there anyway. Page unneeded and unencyclopedic. -Aeinome 05:59, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
• Unrepairable POV. Delete. - Andre Engels 13:14, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: POV by its very nature. Geogre 14:35, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete Reporting a belief held by an identifiable group is not POV. However, if the elements are included under Idolatry this becomes redundant. It could be expanded and cleaned up, but only if it would not be better merged. - Amgine 15:42, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete, gently. The same text is on the talk page, which is where it belongs. Smerdis of Tlön 16:14, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. There's certainly the germ of an article here. The belief that the gods of various religions are just different names for the same divinity is certainly widely held. But I suspect this has been covered elsewhere. --LeeHunter 17:42, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. NeoJustin 03:23, Nov. 23 2004 (UTC)
• It appears to be an excerpt from somewhere else (where it may have been more appropriate) and made into an article. Regardless, as an article it doesn't stand up to examination. Its theme is indeed covered elsewhere. Delete. Fire Star 16:12, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
• Delete [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk)]] 09:11, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.