Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coldfire
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 01:21, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)
Coldfire[edit]
Was listed for speedy, but doesn't meet the criteria. I'm guessing it was marked for deletion due to non-notability. Lachatdelarue (talk) 15:21, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Article admits that they are not signed to a record label. Average Earthman 16:53, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity. — Asbestos | Talk 20:30, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Keep a quote from the deletion policy "Are short almost useless stubs to be kept? - Yes" however i suggest it be moved to the MusicWiki. (Unsigned vot from 68.220.78.181. Anon's third edit. — Asbestos | Talk 11:08, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC))
- Delete. Not an almost useless stub so much as a completely unnotable band. -R. fiend 23:15, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable, possible vanity. Megan1967 02:36, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't meet WikiProject:Music's guidelines for inclusion, and no evidence of notability is given. Tuf-Kat 05:45, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.