Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Pantheist Movement
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
AfDs for this article:
The result was no consensus. The discussion did not reach a consensus, and reviving a seventeen year old discussion is probably less advantageous than just making a new AfD. That will be started shortly. (non-admin closure) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 17:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
World Pantheist Movement[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- World Pantheist Movement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
POV rant page by Paul Vogel. Is there even such an organisation? - David Gerard 21:33, Apr 2, 2004 (UTC)
- Lean towards keeping newly written stub. Over 1000 hits for "World Pantheist Movement". Niteowlneils 21:51, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- I got 2150. Keep stub. Meelar 02:28, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Newly written stub is good. Now the hard part is how to keep Vogel from reverting it to the incoherent POV rant several times a day ... - David Gerard 15:14, Apr 5, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Vogel? -- Cyrius|✎ 02:55, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia talk:Quickpolls for discussion of the 3-revert rule and anons - David Gerard 07:32, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Vogel? -- Cyrius|✎ 02:55, Apr 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Relisted manually. consensus has not been reached–and in my opinion, the question is still valid. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 06:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- Repinging @David Gerard, Cyrius, and Niteowlneils: If you're still around, this discussion isn't over. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 23:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is from 2004, so that discussion's been over for 17 years. I strongly recommend making this a separate new AFD - David Gerard (talk) 06:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough, I'll restart it. Thought it'd be more pertinent to keep the old discussion going, but the article seems to be different now. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 17:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is from 2004, so that discussion's been over for 17 years. I strongly recommend making this a separate new AFD - David Gerard (talk) 06:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
- Repinging @David Gerard, Cyrius, and Niteowlneils: If you're still around, this discussion isn't over. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 23:09, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.