Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Lynching and a Pastry Stand

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. mark 09:45, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

A Lynching and a Pastry Stand[edit]

Non-notable -- Chris 73 Talk 04:14, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete. Even if this book exists—which wouldn't be easy to ascertain—it's unpublished. See my comments regarding the related Schluegenkopf article at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Schluegenkopf. -- Hadal 04:22, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete suspect hoax... if a book connects the owners of a bakery to a lynching a century ago, would it make any sense that the bakery would display the book, as the article states? On the tiny sliver of chance that this article is truthful, an unpublished book about an obscure bakery wouldn't be notable enough for an article anyway. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 04:44, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Unpublished book. Zero google hits. Gamaliel 05:51, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, not notable, possible hoax. Megan1967 05:55, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as vandalism, this is a hoax is all. Wyss 03:38, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. Patent nonsense. RickK 00:19, Mar 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Oh dear, mere whimsy. (If you're going to attempt a hoax, less whimsy and more wit, please!) Delete. -- Hoary 04:54, 2005 Mar 16 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-Notable. (The book exists, but its not notable enough for wiki)-Eddyrichards 23:55, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.