Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Feldman

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mike Feldman[edit]

Mike Feldman was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep.


vanity or policruft DCEdwards1966 00:33, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep, and I doubt that the Deputy Mayor of Toronto is creating vanity articles about himself. - SimonP 01:18, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. If he was an ordinary councillor I would have voted delete (there's around 30000 of them in Britain alone), but as he's deputy mayor of a major city I guess he must be somewhat notable. Rje 01:22, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • The positions are quite different in Canada and the UK. Each Toronto city councillor represents some 57,000 people, and we have articles on many of them. - SimonP 02:01, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
      • The size of the article would be the problem, not the position par se. Some councillors are noteworthy, some are not, a sub-stub just saying "Person X is a city councillor in Toronto, they have 4 grandchildren" would look like vanity to me, or at least a page for a non-notable person. A deputy-mayor for a major city is notable, in my view. Rje 02:31, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, there seems to be potential for expansion. Shimeru 02:38, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep All city councillors of major cities deserve pages. Earl Andrew 02:55, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep it. —RaD Man (talk) 03:09, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep Spinboy 03:10, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: I don't see how being the debuty mayor of any city is inherently notable. Has the man done anything of note besides holding this position? DCEdwards1966 03:39, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is a verifyable public figure. Bryan 06:10, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, obviously. Neutralitytalk 06:59, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Since vfd posting, YUL89YYZ added two paragraphs and I just added three, hopefully putting Feldman in much better context and showing even greater notability than in the original two sentence stub. Samaritan 07:34, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. YUL89YYZ is a respectable user and won't add stupid articles. utcursch 10:48, Dec 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Ignoring my Toronto residency during the week, Feldman's article has expanded greatly. Ironically, he doesn't have as much of a public recognition as former deputy mayor Case Ootes, one of my personal favourite councillors ever. -- user:zanimum
  • I don't think there's much chance of this one being deleted, but put me down for keep all the same. CJCurrie 01:33, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Public figure, inherently noteworthy and encyclopedic. GRider\talk 17:51, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Obvious keep. Dan100 11:04, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete, non notable. Megan1967 03:52, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_Feldman&oldid=357559444"