Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chogyal Namkhai Norbu

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:11, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Chogyal Namkhai Norbu[edit]

Stub, possibly non-notable Whig 13:25, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, main teacher of a notable Buddhist group. Martg76 16:48, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, more than 3,000 hits on Google. Revolución 19:09, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If the subject is notable, then it ought to contain more than the person's name and date/place of birth. This is hardly an encyclopedic article at present, anyhow. Whig 21:08, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article does not establish notability. Rick K 22:46, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
Keep, I dug up some information about him and added what I could to the article. He seems to be very important where Dzogchen is concerned. SirGeneral 23:39, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. After Sir Gerneral's edit, it seems notable enough for mine. Capitalistroadster 01:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article does not establish notability. Megan1967 05:58, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If all of those books were published then it's a clear Keep. Vegaswikian 06:01, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable on the basis of his writings, at least. Xoloz 19:04, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article does not establish notability. JamesBurns 11:14, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Sir General's article establishes notability. Kappa 21:47, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.