User talk:Ivica83~enwiki

I am sorry but there are no sources which the "Bulgarians" claim to be falsified. If you are talking about statements like "Macedonia for the Macedonians" and the thing about being a good Macedonian, a good Bulgarian, etc. - no one in Bulgaria has ever hidden or denied them. As Delchev spoke of Macedonian as a future nationality comprising the Macedonian Bulgarians, Greeks, Serbs, Turks, Vlachs, Jews, etc., hence later the vision of Macedonia as Switzerland of the Balkans. This has been mentioned in a number of serious books by Western authors regarding the Macedonian Question. I have even seen it in an extremely controversial (in my opinion) report on the "Macedonian minority" in Bulgaria by Helsinki Watch, which could be blamed for partiality to practically everyone else but the Bulgarians and the Bulgarian cause. The Charter of the IMRO included a condition that the members can be only ethnic Bulgarians until as late as 1902 when this was replaced with "all dissatisfied elements in Macedonia and the Adrianople Vilayet". Delchev became member in 1895, do you follow my line of thought? As for the rest - I am not editting either in the Bulgarian, or in the Macedonian version of Wikipedia so I have no idea what happens in there. VMORO 14:47, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)

Hi Ivica. I don't think I can vote as I am some kind of a puppy they say (less than 50 edits?). I think my comment just provoked this unfortunate fellow VMORO to make yet another questionable contribution. Na zdravje, --Paletakis 12:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi Ivica. Please take a look at my talk page, for I replied to your position regarding the Macedonians matter. --dionyziz 15:48, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC).

Russian tsarinas

regarding the names of tsarinas of Russia: if from abroad, they changed their first name, such as Wilhelmina became Natalia Alexeievna, etc. Now, Wikipedia has certain rules that the so-called consort name is not to be used, because of several persons being e.g Empress Maria Fedorovna. And that a pre-marital name should be used. But I feel that it is acceptable to make a formulation "Natalia Alexeievna of Darmstadt" (the "of Darmstadt" being for disambiguation purposes) instead of using "Wilhelmina of Darmstadt". Now, as there are plenty of Germanist and anglicist opinions, I would like to know some of international opinion. In other words, I am asking you to think whether from the perspective of non-Russian Slavonic, (1) would it be acceptable to say "Natalia Alexeievna of Darmstadt" and (2) would that be better or worse than "Wilhelmina of Darmstadt". 62.78.105.68 08:58, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

n.b. This is an ongoing policy discussion, and several other options are on the table as well as the ones suggested above. Please consider visiting this talk page and endorsing one of the options, or adding one of your own. Thanks! Choess 01:05, July 22, 2005 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nmp-oficijalenjpeg.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Nmp-oficijalenjpeg.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Makedoncis

why don't you ask a SlavMacedonian>> "you are Macedonian. ok. but what kind? this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basil_II or this one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuil_of_Bulgaria ?"

there is a confusion about this, you should get familiar with it before making assumptions and form opinions. see [1]
150.140.225.175 (talk) 13:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Ivica83. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Ivica83~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

14:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)