User talk:Isomorphic/archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Older comments[edit]

Hi Isomorphic :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay. (I love your username! What are you isomorphic to?)

Some links that may be of use:

Thanks, and keep contributing :) Dysprosia 07:40, 11 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for rewriting Open source intelligence. I moved your temp version to Open source intelligence now and deleted the original. Angela. 06:18, 8 Dec 2003 (UTC)

No problem, glad to do it. The article could still use work, but it gives the basics at least. Isomorphic 03:54, 9 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hey, you said in my talk page that I am better at formatting pages then you, and I can contribute to wikipedia. Wanna make an article or something? Epheterson 03:40, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hi Isomorphi,

Thanks for your remarks on my talk page.

I think Wikipedia folks need to take it easy on newcomers who create profile pages on the main directory. Gently inform them that the info belongs on the uers provile, not on the encyclopedic directory.

Also, I ask you for some slack on me. How many people join Wikipedia having condemplated founding an encyclopedia themselves?

Okay, so I'm a bit ambitious. Just work with me, but don't shun me for exuberance alone.

I sense that now that you've had a chance to review my site you can see that I am capable of objective reporting.

Here is the latest press release I've composed, as another sample of what I can do with the subject of alternative energy:

Genesis World Energy Under Investigation for Fraud - NJ Attorney General's office engaged in full investigation into likely securities fraud. Eyewitnesses say one of the bench-top model used by GWE for proof of concept demos is nothing more than a slight modification of a fuel cell device sold at Hammacher Schlemmer.

Would you now consider going into the vote:delete page and reversing your position?

Thanks

Sterlingda 07:19, 10 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Your comment on my user_talk page indicates you would consider changing your vote on the Free Energy Project Control Panel. Why not go ahead and do it. Since you are the one who first suggested the page be deleted, that would make a statement as to it value upon further consideration.

Thanks for your advice. It is good advice.

Sterlingda 07:40, 12 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Hi. You should stick new user messages on their talk pages, not in their user pages. Secretlondon 17:24, Jan 1, 2004 (UTC)

As a quick question, why was the text you removed from auction a self-contradiction? There are two sorts of equivalences to auctions: theoretical equivalence (which refers to the behavior of profit-maximizing, rational agents) and practical equivalence (what happens when human beings, or at least participants in an experiment, bid). In this case "theoretically equivalent" has a meaning apart from "not in practice equivalent" --kevinatilusa

Hey Isomorphic

Thanks for the encouragement. It's nice to see what a supportive community you guys are building here at wikipedia. I really am just a high school student (a junior now), but I study a lot of stuff that interests me on my own time. See you around. Jcobb 04:26, Feb 21, 2004 (UTC)

Request for Comments on Plautus satire[edit]

Your comments are requested on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Plautus satire. →Raul654 05:14, Feb 19, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the heads-up. I'll be sure to mention it; it's a good idea. Cheers, Meelar 05:53, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for the welcome No Guru 17:09, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome. I'll be pottering around improving New Zealand entries mainly, with more reciprocal links to and from www.zeal.com.:robinp 21:23, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Not that I'm offended at all, and I greatly appreciate your defending me to Plautus (I can't figure out where PS's hostility came from), but in the interests of the truth....I'm a "he", not a "she". :-) Thanks again for your well-chosen words on Plautus's talk page -- keep it up! We need more like you, regardless of gender. ;-) Jwrosenzweig 22:28, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thank You[edit]

Thank you for your kind message welcoming me to Wikipedia. In the short time I have been here I have found that the people are very freindly. Oh and Motorola 68008 won't be my last time doing dirty work lol ;). Theyapps 05:46, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC) <----:) thanx for lesson 2 :)

Wait a sec[edit]

Isomorphic - you're on the Maryland quiz bowl team? I assume that's Adam Fine's team you're talking about. Cool! - I'm on the Delaware team (w/ Roger Craig and company). →Raul654 05:35, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)

Hats[edit]

Thanks for the heads up, the hats and headgear team just doubled in size! I've added the new-user-introductions page to my watchlist (when I heard of it the other day I thought it was a dumb idea, how wrong could I have been?) and I will check it for hat people every day from now on.  ;) fabiform | talk 20:15, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Plautus[edit]

Iso: I'll tell you what I told Jamesday - it appears that Plautus has decided to ignore what you have told him, and has instead decided to take to expand his tin-foil hattery vandalism to include several other articles. His talk page shows that talking with him in an excercise in frustration. I think you might want to reconsider your vote at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Plautus satire. →Raul654 04:18, Feb 21, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the kind welcome. User:Joe_Cetina

Oddly enough[edit]

Actually, that's not me. I know that my IP's something else...though, I did see alot of 207's around. Thanks for asking though! I'll probably add in my previous edits though. User:Parelle

Oh, I'm a tad concerned myself...whomever 207 is, they're doing exactly what i'm doing, down to the massive number of random female hobbits. They also corrected my entry on Merry brandybuck, and i'd just written that at the time....

Or then again, perhaps a shadow. Though, I'd have to admit, they're more through than I - they did catch some of my typos, and the ablity to find the most amazingly unknown hobbits surely takes more talent...if they would actually register, now that would make it easier!

Hey man. Thanks for the welcome. I'm actually seeding a bunch of articles for the course we're going to run (as well as on electronic/computer music topics in general). The course won't be run until September, which gives me a bit of time to get up a few things on the site. Rev3rend 08:11, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Isomorphic, thanks (to you and Angela) for the kind and encouraging welcome. I looked at the climate page and agree with the objections about the Koppen's classification making ~80% of the article. The page will also need to cover more topics on climate. I'll discuss this in the page discussion and eventually make the edits when I get to it. Matt Borak 22:44, 21 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing Popa Chubby! Mark Richards 21:53, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Once again user talk:bensaccount, quit complaining on my talk page, I only create the definitions I need for the articles I edit. If you dont like inhalation or exhalation, stop breathing (the page) as well.

As a neutral observer, allow me to point you to the relavant policy - Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. →Raul654 03:38, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
This is not a policy, read it again! Bensaccount 03:54, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Let me put it another way - if I were to list those pages on the VFD right now, I guarentee they would be deleted as "dictionary definitions." They need to be expanded or deleted. →Raul654 03:58, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)

Iso, thanks for the nice welcome and useful introduction. --Rj 05:45, Feb 25, 2004 (UTC)

So unifying conjecture survives VfD. I think that process is flawed; but you might anyway like to see the page now that I have tried to pin down the good that can be found in the concept.

Charles Matthews 12:45, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Delete pages[edit]

Hi, thanks for catching some of the nonsense pages that are created. However, rather than blanking them, paste on top of the article {{msg:delete}}. That way admins can track and delete them more easily. Dori | Talk 19:52, Mar 1, 2004 (UTC)

---

Thanks for the kind welcome to the welcoming comittee! I remember being confused when I was new, so I thought I should help out here. By the way is there any official forum or meetingplace for this group? Ludraman, 2027, 1/3/04.

I have just been reading through the Welcoming committe talk page and you make some pretty good points. About your Wikipedia tutorial, I fully agree with the idea. I say we just set up a page and start making it. One important thing is to keep it in one long article - the way it is you have to follow a scatter of links to pick up information. How about creating the page - I know I would spend a good while writing it with other users. What do you think? Ludraman, 2040, 1/3/04.

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the nice welcome message. Indeed, I have a question: What is the recommended way to make footnotes? See e.g. Debian#Footnotes and Talk:Debian for the way I figured out to produce some. Haven't found anything on footnotes yet in the help. --XTaran 23:28, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Admin nomination[edit]

Hey Mark - just to let you know, Perl nominated you for adminship. It looks like it's going to sail through, too, you just need to officially accept it. I'd like to offer (premature) congradulations and best wishes for a happy admin career. →Raul654 05:34, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)

Congrats - you definitely deserve it and at 10 supporting, nil against - you're in. I'm hoping to become a sysop in the near future - what do you think? Ludraman 19:34, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Congratulations. You will make an excellent admin! Perl 02:14, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)

DSHIT[edit]

Hey Mark - I'll be moderating at DSHIT on saturday. You gonna be there? →Raul654 05:13, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC)

Kayless, Keiless, etc.[edit]

Yeah, it is probably a bit much; it's just that I was thinking of when I'd first heard of him watching the show but wasn't able to find any information online because I didn't know how the name was spelled. -- Djinn112 03:46, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC)

re: Dagestan[edit]

The article was nothing but a revert war. It also looked to me like that guy was just taking the cyrillic script out, not replacing it with another version. He also vandalized Wik's page, and kept blanking his own talk page when other people told him to act more reasonably. He can continue his work on the talk page. I'll let the protection stand for a while. You can ask another administrator to unprotect it if you want. Dori | Talk 01:49, Mar 8, 2004 (UTC)

re: School project[edit]

Thanks for the pointer to the school projects page - I think my assignment was in the spirit of the 'pedia, and am not overly worried about the students marauding through, writing crap. Still, good to get some collected experience. Espen 11:59, 8 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Sysop[edit]

Congratulations! You are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. Good luck. Angela. 00:11, Mar 9, 2004 (UTC)

Congratulations! Perl 00:23, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hello

I have noticed that you have made valuable contributions to economics pages from time to time. You might be interested to know that there is an economics article Labor market nominated for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. If you have the time, could you take a look and leave any comments that you feel are appropriate. mydogategodshat 04:10, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the contribution to labour market. You can also leave comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates if you wish. mydogategodshat 07:13, 9 Mar 2004 (UTC)

You should feel free to revert any Bird-related edits. There is not much worth keeping. Fuzheado 07:05, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the welcome.

I'll see what I can do for African history. I noticed that the History of Spain was pretty shabby after the Medieval period, so I thought I'd give that a try too. I'm presently reading a work on the history of West Africa (which, by my impression, seems to be where most African history happened outside the Med. coast.) so we might be in luck.

But thank you again, and to all the admins, for their work on Wikipedia. I think it's an magnificent and worthwhile project.

Adam Faanes 17:27, 10 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Isomorphic. I took the liberty of redrawing the graphs on Labour economics so that the lines are thinner and the text easier to read. I also moved Labour economics into the section on Featured article candidates for nominations with unresolved objections. I couldn't really tell from your comments whether you were objecting to the article or not, but if I misinterpretted you, or the new graphs improve the article for you, then you should put the nomination back up into the "no objections" category. And, if you prefer the old graphs, feel free to revert of course.  :) fabiform | talk 03:51, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the note on my talk page. I realised my Irish breakfast entry did not conform to the naming conventions (I'd capitalised the second word), so I moved/renamed the entry. I had already submitted it a while back! I've read much more of the relevant "learner" pages now though! Zoney 14:04, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the warm welcome I recieved on my talk page. DryGrain 19:43, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)


First, thanks for your welcome message. I love the sense of acceptance it gives. I really think that people are more likely to stay in a group when it's immediately obvious that they've been noticed.

Just a quick question on user talk ettiquette: is there a preffered place to respond to these messages (ie. the user talk page with the original message or the page of the person being responded to)? It seems logical to keep discussions to a single page, but it seems to me you'll be more likely to see a message on your own talk page.

As for finding subjects to write about, if the stacks of books in every room of my house are anything to go by, I shouldn't have difficulty. rparle 20:23, Mar 12, 2004 (UTC)

Interlang links, translation project[edit]

Greetings, and thanks for the welcome. Quiz bowl ad eternum! What I really was getting at w/ the interlang links is:

  1. the person making the link often makes small mistakes -- linking an adjective in en: to an adverb in de: or even to a noun; linking a political movement to a particular political group w/ similar name; etc.
  2. the translations need to somehow be kept up to date.
  3. some arts are pure translation -- ja: has no info (online, in its userbase) to reproduce the version in fr:, so it needs an expert fr:-->ja: translator to really get the target art right; a partial transl is good, but should somehow be noted as imperfect
  4. there's no way to request a translated art -- or to see that one exists in other langs for translation.

Potential Solutions:

  1. an interlang "requested pages" special page, which provides some automated translation of each page name into your preferred language; it would be awesome to see that irony was a much-requested but absent page in es:, with a link to the es: page and one to possibly-matching en: and fr: pages.
  2. multi-lingual / synonym searching for a matching title, so you can say "search for all synonyms of 'cake'" or "search fo 'cake' in de: and fr:" and see how many possibly-related art titles exist.
  3. a translator project that works over major arts, from largest categories and most popular topics down, and tries to unify
    • category structure / distribution
    • category substructure / naming conventions
    • navigation and template structure
    • lang links [many arts are linked from en: when they are translated to a new lang, but if they are already in 4 langs, the other 3 langs don't get the new trans-lang link]
    • quality assurance (maintenance of lists of "partly-" and "barely-translated" arts to help translators who want to find arts for language copyediting)
  4. a lock-step 'recent changes' setup which makes merging the latest changes from a variety of langs easy. For instance: Marilyn Monroe gets heavily updated, independently, in 4 langs. A potential translator comes along... The following are answerable questions, particularly if we use en: as a lingua franca(sic) and accept piecemeal updating of the en: version to/from each other lang --
    • Who merges these updates?
    • When was the last time the various arts were unified?
    • What is the diff b/t the current rev and the last-unified rev, for en: and a given lang?
    • Is one lang particularly out of date?
    • Which translators / contributors were interested in this art at some point?

Is there already a project page about this? My lang skills are broad and poor, not good enough to spearhead any kind of translation, but I would be glad to sharpen them on such a project, half an hour at a time, and bet many other WPans would too. +sj+ 20:52, 2004 Mar 12 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the info. As long as you don't throw any bottles at me, you terps are fine by me :p.

Drunkasian 18:18, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)

==Academic Challenger and Adminship== Hi Isomorphic. Thanks for taking an interest in my request for adminship. Since there will not be a consensus on my nomination, and I realize now that I don't need to be an admin right now, I will withdraw my nomination. I am starting to do some housekeeping-type work, like fixing some articles at Wikipedia: Cleanup. I may try to become an admin again in a few mohnths, but I realize why I do not need to become one now. I am glad that you like my contributions. I admit that part of the reason I nominated myself was to see what people thought of my contributions. Again, thank you for your time and interest. Academic Challenger 10:31, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Getting a timestamp[edit]

Hi. Can you further elaborate what you mean by "You can sign your name on talk pages by using " Moncrief " for your username and " Moncrief 05:12, Mar 14, 2004 (UTC) " for your username and a timestamp." That's not clear to me. I've trying to figure out how to get an automatic timestamp since I've been editing here, at least two or three months now. I'm still adding it manually, which is kind of a pan. Thanks. Moncrief, 14 Mar 2004

HA HA ! It worked!! That's all I need to do huh?? 4 tildes, quite literally?? Fascinating. Trying it again---> " Moncrief 05:14, Mar 14, 2004 (UTC) "

Sergeant Major[edit]

I hope my small revision is in some way a help.

Paul, in Saudi

Latin[edit]

After seeing some Latin on your page, I'm wondering: How much Latin do you know? Do you make any edits on the Latin Wikipedia? The Latin Wikipedia could really use improvement, so c'mon down! Vicipaedia Latina magna est! Ludraman | Talk 20:27, 14 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Leet Speak[edit]

Hey Mark - you should know - Leet speak is now officially punishable by death ;) →Raul654 07:30, Mar 17, 2004 (UTC)

Boilerplate welcome[edit]

You don't mind if I take your welcome boilerplate and change it around? I might save a copy on one of my pages after I've changed a few things. Ludraman | Talk 15:58, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Zzfly123[edit]

That IS odd. --Merovingian ↕ Talk 05:27, Mar 19, 2004 (UTC)

PS. Sorry about the User page edit.

Deletion[edit]

It's always fun when two people delete the same page at the same time. --Merovingian ↕ Talk 03:55, Mar 20, 2004 (UTC)

Don't we all... all... all? --Merovingian ↕ Talk 04:23, Mar 20, 2004 (UTC)

Comments invited[edit]

Hi Isomorphic, thanks for the welcome. I have been busy adding pages about cycles. If you wanted to cast an eye over them and make any comments about style etc it would be welcome. I have too many as yet unresoolved links. I have had a disagreement about cycle or cycles and there is discussion under talk:cycle. RayTomes 10:38, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Isomorphic Its me again. I have looked through the list of people with various interests and found you in several places that I am also interested in. I want to ask you about a couple of items that I would like to do for wikipedia before I do them, but right now would ask you to have a look at a couple of items for your views. I am new to wiki and wikipedia and am having some differences of opinions with User:IMSoP but in a civilised way. The places to view if you are willing are cycles and talk:cycle plus links that he put from there. Thanks, RayTomes 10:20, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Picture tutorial[edit]

Mark - I've written Wikipedia:Picture tutorial, which should help new users grasp the fundemental of wikiformat pictures. I'd recommend you add it to the manual you've been working on. →Raul654 08:31, Mar 26, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment[edit]

Thanks for the support and nice words. I needed a little ego boost. :) Makes it worthwhile being in this community! Cecropia 01:15, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Nyah![edit]

How dare you ask for actual information! I demand unclear and vague articles! :P - Texture 16:54, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Welcoming Committee[edit]

You're probably right... guess I got a little overzealous ;) --Wolf530 06:15, Mar 30, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the welcome, Isomorphic. I'm absolutely new at this, so I'm sure I'll have questions. Physicist 06:33, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Derbent[edit]

I have removed Derbent from Wikipedia:Copyright problems since permission was granted to use the text. Shall I delete Derbent/Temp? - Texture 15:56, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Gadfium[edit]

Thanks for the welcome, and the cleanup of my article on Michael King. I realise that's how things work here - someone puts in a stub and others fill in details and improve the Wikification of it, and the original person learns a bit more of the Wikipedia culture and can do better on their next article.

Do you have a particular interest in King, or were you simply checking out new articles? Gadfium 23:10, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)

CryptoDerk[edit]

Hi, thanks for the welcome. I'm happy to see that my talk page works. When I jump into something, I jump into it full force. So, I'm finishing up my masters thesis and I'm still finding a lot of time to fool around on here, heh (perhaps to the detriment of my thesis). I'm all about free knowledge, and even wrote a book on programming in C for the classes I teach, which is of course freely available online. I am a huge proponent of putting everything online, and I hope to make some good contributions here. CryptoDerk 07:42, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)

Dan Matic[edit]

'ello. Thanks for the greeting. I thought someone just assumed I knew what I was doing, and left me to it. :) Dan Matic 10:02, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Sunset[edit]

Thanks Iso! Mark Richards 22:04, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

disturbing behavior?[edit]

How is it disturbing behavior to change usernames? My name is clearly indicated on my contact information page. If you are too lazy to click on that to see what my name is, why are you complaining about others behavior. (sorry if that sounded rude) I changed names because I didn't like people (wik) insulting me all the time. Perl 15:29, 2 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome[edit]

You can be sure I will stick around.

On stubs[edit]

Thanks for the thanks. The comments are left largely for Matt Crypto and myself. He has been furiously adding material in this past month (and seems to have taken a bit of a vacation in the last few days; exams??) and I've been at it (largely in crypto stuff) for a couple of years, though nothing like so furiously. As a result of the reorganizations of the past month, lots of folks who had 'sort of been paying attention' to crypto topics may now be lost, and the stubs/pointers may be useful to them as well.

But, since you're an administrator, and have brought up this issue, you may be able to suggest an official way to leave pointers for future editing, avoiding the Talk page which 'takes longer'. Or is the only official way the Talk page?

ww 19:44, 5 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Isomorphic, Having interacted above, it occurs to me to ask whether there is any point in being an administrator. I notice that I have been contributing for just about 2 years, and that some I've interacted with who are administrators have been here for much shorter times. Am I missing something here? Comment would be appreciated. ww 20:40, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)

There is an agreed convention that bird articles are capitalised, with an obligatory American style lowercase redirect. All the hundreds of bird articles have been written in accordance with this convention. I'll track down the location of the convention, but it may be some time. jimfbleak

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Birds gives the convention, although I can't remember where the original of the policy is. There are some other groups like cetaceans which have de facto signed up to the bird style. Jim

Hello. I got your message on my talk page, but I've had no time to answer until now. Right now, studying maths all day is enough for me, since it consumes me and all of my time. But I'll see what can I do when (and if) I have some free time.
Por cierto, ¿habla usted español? No lo sabía. If you want to practice your Spanish, well, I speak Spanish too. --Fibonacci 02:44, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome message! I'm happy to see the articles on the Boulangers. For the last couple days I've been bubbling over with enthusiasm about Wikipedia to various friends; hopefully I can turn some of that enthusiasm into writing in my (not) copious spare time. I'm sure I'll have plenty of questions ... but so far the documentation and examples have been superb. Be well! Antandrus 01:39, 8 Apr 2004 (UTC)

admining[edit]

Isomorphic,

I've thought it over and what the heck.... I blundered across the WP, and just started out to improve the article on cryptography. From there I went to Pearl Harbor and it grew... I suspect that's not too different than many folks. Now I'm not too sure I will be a very active admin in policing others, and I haven't run across much vandalism myself, but I'm willing to give it a try.

So whatever vetting needs to be done...

Thanks, ww 23:33, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Isomorphic,
Thanks for the nomination, and the trouble of looking through a long and somewhat singleminded list of edits. You are incorrect, however, that I have not been involved in some WP controversies. A glance at (archived) discussion at Talk:philosophy of science, and mostly the same at Talk:scientific method, will disclose an ongoing disagreement as to the content of those articles. In the second case, it has gone so far as an NPOV header. And a look at Talk:cryptography will show another, this time over style/coverage/details, and similar matters. In both cases the main (not the right word exactly, but I can't come up with a better in eitehr case) 'disputant' is a single person, and nothing has gone to the level of an edit war or anything similar. I have little to feel inappropriate about in my contributions in either case (over many months in the first and almost a month in the second), but their existence may be relevant, now that you bring them up.
As for 'enemies', I'm aware of none.
ww 15:40, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Isomorphic,
Just looked at requests for admin, and I blush.... Modesty, after all. The only factual problem I see is with what you've written is that the earliest edit I was able to find (when it occurred to me to go looking a month or two ago) was an anonymous one in April 03. But I think I remember some before that (maybe in Feb). If that matters at all...
Thanks again.
ww 15:54, 13 Apr 2004 (UTC)

--

Thanks for the welcome message and for answering my question. See you around ;) --Voodoo 01:20, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Hi, Isomorphic. The other shoe finally dropped. Thanks for your defense of me and kind words. Cecropia 01:35, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Sage advice, indeed! Thanks again. Cecropia 02:11, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Architecture[edit]

Hi Isomorphic Wikiproject:Architecture sounds like a great idea. I'll start thinking of some ideas. Naming and dating conventions seem like the biggest problems, offhand. Warofdreams 01:37, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

I've made a start. Would you like to add your name, and initiate some debate? Warofdreams 02:45, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Translation[edit]

Done! It's probably sloppy, but I did what I could. If you'd give it a brief look, I'd love that: if it looks right, it would be great if you'd move your request to completed on the Translations page (sorry to delegate! I promise I'm not as lazy as that seems, but I'm taking off in a few minutes :-). Oh, and I encourage you to use your mighty admin powers for awesome.  ;-) Have a great day, see you around the 'pedia, keep up the excellent work! Jwrosenzweig 19:51, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Isomorphic/archive1&oldid=571883580"