User talk:Istara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

Whosyourjudas (talk) 21:32, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Storey vs. story[edit]

There was no typo in the Burj-al-Arab article. "Storey" (for floor) is merely an alternative spelling for "story".

See m-w.com:

Main Entry: story Variant(s): also sto·rey /'stOr-E, 'stor-E/ Function: noun Inflected Form(s): plural stories also storeys Etymology: Middle English storie, from Medieval Latin historia picture, story of a building, from Latin, history, tale; probably from pictures adorning the windows of medieval buildings 1 a : the space in a building between two adjacent floor levels or between a floor and the roof b : a set of rooms in such a space c : a unit of measure equal to the height of the story of a building <one story high> 2 : a horizontal division of a building's exterior not necessarily corresponding exactly with the stories within

Cheers! :-) -- H005 13:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UAE blocked?[edit]

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Blocking_UAE.3F William M. Connolley 11:28, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.

Thanks! Rosemary Amey 01:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Man in brown suit.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Man in brown suit.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 02:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mrs George de Horne Vaizey, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.athelstane.co.uk/hornvaiz/hornvaiz.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xacti for deletion[edit]

The article Xacti is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xacti until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ColinFine (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Honey Couture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7 -- does not indicate that the subject of the article is important or significant. Has been tagged for notability since 2010.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 05:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Istara. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 14:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Cornus (genus), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aneas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justin Bieber on Twitter for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Bieber on Twitter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Bieber on Twitter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Informing you of this nomination because of your previous participation in the Justin Bieber on Twitter merge into Justin Bieber discussion.--LauraHale (talk) 06:42, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Ameinfo building thumb.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:47, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 12d Solutions (August 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 19:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Istara! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 19:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Istara,
It appears that this is substantially a translation of this French language Wikipedia article. Technically, if you don't say it's a translation somewhere - in an edit summary, on the article talk page - it's a copyright violation.
Apologies if I'm telling you things you already know.
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:11, 24 January 2019 (UTC) I didn’t know, thanks, but how can Wikipedia plagiarise itself?! I deliberately translated as I figured that data was ready approved. Istara (talk) 03:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).[reply]