User talk:The dude~enwiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I recommend you peruse our neutrality policy before making any further edits. Your edits to William Rivers Pitt were not neutral, nor were they helpful. This image alone amounts to vandalism. If you continue to make such edits you may be blocked from editing. -- Hadal 06:45, 21 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Until you remove comments stating that Will Pitt is left wing. I will continue to deface. If you decide to ban me, I will register another name and do the same thing.

Wow.. an admission of nefarious intent. I wish I could say such a thing is rare here. That alone is grounds for a block. I'll be lenient though; let's see if you reconsider first. -- Hadal 06:52, 21 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

go ahead sir but this leftist doesn't like to be told that William Rivers Pitt is one.

I'm a leftist too; but from reading Pitt's own words, he seems pretty left-wing to me. At least, relative to Bush. I'm Canadian, so I can understand that not everyone sees the US Democrats as "liberal" to the same degree. But Pitt is considered left-wing in his country; could you point out any evidence to the contrary? -- Hadal 07:12, 21 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

He is a whore for kerry.

He may well be, but that verdict doesn't seem to be the consensus. Your opinion of him does not invalidate his political affiliations. Surely you can agree Kerry is left-wing relative to Bush? -- Hadal 07:52, 21 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

So is George Bush, if you put him next to Pat Buchanan, does it make him one in General? Of course not. Kerry himself has disassociated from being labelled Liberal/left-wing, so what the fuck are you talking about?


Furthermore, it wasn't me who wrote the all caps on juvenile shit, there are plenty of others left and right who have gripes with William Rivers Pitt. So stop saying I did it. When I make changes, I use this username and will continue to do so until you ban me or something. But there are plenty of true leftists who wont be impressed by your shilling for William Rivers Pitt and they will try to state the truth.

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is William Rivers Pitt. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Rivers Pitt (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

03:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed[edit]

19:37, 22 April 2015 (UTC)