User talk:TK-P

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi TK-P, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Don't worry if you're unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia. Be bold!

The most useful page for newcomers is the tutorial. Once you are used to editing text, you may want to take a look at the picture tutorial. If you do a lot of copyedits, the Manual of Style will be very useful.

Nobody is expected to be familiar with the details of Wikipedia policies or etiquette right away. However, two basic guidelines that help make Wikipedia successful are: avoid bias and be civil. Every contribution helps Wikipedia develop great articles, while the very best become Featured Articles. Much more information can be found at the Community Portal.

When you want a laugh, drop by the unusual articles list. By the way, when on a talk page or vote page, you can sign your edit with your username and date stamp by typing four tildes (~~~~). If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.

Your class project to contribute women's studies articles will be much appreciated. It's great to see that Countering Systemic Bias is prompting people to focus on some neglected areas. Again, welcome! - BanyanTree 03:09, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Let me second that welcome. I'm looking forward to see you and your students' contributions! Kind regards, mark 03:14, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Your new article[edit]

I noticed that you had recently written an article Feminine Beauty & the USA Popular Media for Wikipedia. I would like to comment on your piece here, in the spirit of working together to make Wikipedia even better. While I found your article quite interesting -- and I am quite sympathetic to the points you make -- I believe that your article is more of an essay à la Montaigne than an encyclopaedic article. It seems to be, to a certain extent at least, a work of original research. When you write, "Even though women shouldn’t be as caught up with their weight and being thin, it is hard to avoid when a person constantly faces things that make them feel pressured," it is clear that you write as an advocate, and your piece veers towards being an editorial. Are "the expectations set for women today... completely unreal?" Perhaps they are, but this is an opinion. For instance, there has recently been some research that has tentatively suggested that an ultra-low calorie diet (for men and women) can lead to greater longevity as well as greater energy during old age. Also, one could very plausibly argue that with obesity becoming more and more of a problem, not only in the U.S. but worldwide, that social pressure to be thinner is actually positive.

These issues are complicated, and as I have said, I am actually rather sympathetic to the opinions that you have expressed here. However, and here is the important thing, they are *opinions*, not facts. Thus, I would kindly suggest a rewrite of your article, in order to make it no longer be a work of original research, to deal with some NPOV problems that show up and to change its tone. --Zantastik 23:55, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)

More remarks[edit]

Dr. Kasperick-Postellon,

I would like to add a bit to what I said earlier. I think that what you're doing with your students is an excellent idea -- it's innovative ideas like these that make Wikipedia better. However, perhaps it might be good if you told your students a bit more about the style that Wikipedia expects (npov encyclopedia pieces, rather than essays), as I have found some similar problems in other articles your students have contributed. But with these changes, your students' articles are wonderful contributions to Wikipedia, and are badly needed when some of these vitally important topics simply aren't dealt with. Zantastik 06:01, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)


Agree with everything said by Zantastik. Lotsofissues 16:51, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

An anti-feminist conspiracy?[edit]

You might be interested in this 210.50.69.1 10:11, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hi TKP, I've just done a quick copy edit of the above, but there are quite a few problems remaining with it, many to do with the lack of complete citations. I've left a comment on Talk:Rape on college campuses and I've also inserted some invisible questions in the text. Your input would be much appreciated. Best, SlimVirgin (talk) 19:55, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

Research survey invitation[edit]

Greetings TK-P-

My name is Randall Livingstone, and I am a doctoral student at the University of Oregon, studying digital media and online community. I am posting to invite you to participate in my research study exploring the work of Wikipedia editors who are members of WikiProject: Countering Systemic Bias. The online survey should take 20 to 25 minutes to complete and can be found here:

https://oregon.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_cSHzuwaQovaZ6ss

Your responses will help online communication researchers like me to better understand the collaborations, challenges, and purposeful work of Wikipedia editors like you. In addition, at the end of the survey you will have the opportunity to express your interest in a follow-up online interview with the researcher.

This research project has been reviewed and approved by the Wikimedia Research Committee as well as the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon. For a detailed description of the project, please visit its Meta page. This survey is voluntary, and your confidentiality will be protected. You will have the choice of using your Wikipedia User Name during the research or creating a unique pseudonym. You may skip any question you choose, and you may withdraw at any time. By completing the survey, you are providing consent to participate in the research.

If you have any questions about the study, please contact me via my Talk Page (UOJComm) or via email. My faculty advisor is Dr. Ryan Light. If you have any questions regarding your rights as a research participant, please contact the Office for Protection of Human Subjects at the University of Oregon.

Thank you very much.

Sincerely,

Randall Livingstone School of Journalism & Communication University of Oregon UOJComm (talk) 18:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should come hang out with us on the internetz![edit]

v