User talk:Easyas12c

Welcome!

Hello, Easyas12c, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

I hope you will add more articles about the lifestyle to Wikipedia. Johntex 18:01, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

FNORD[edit]

Hi! This is Icarus!, being non-Wiki (I'm not logged in...), saying thanx for the work on the Discordianism page! Keep it up!24.176.20.60 16:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fart Fetish[edit]

You asked if I could transfer some knowledge from my copy of Encyclopedia of Unusual Sex Practices about flatuphilia. Well, really all there is under the entry is what I already provided on the deletion page for fart fetish. The only thing I left out was a brief letter to the author from a flatuphiliac who described a short experience he had with a woman who helped him indulge in the fetish. So go ahead and take what you need from what I posted already. As far as the book is concerned, here is some more reference info for it: ISBN - 1-56980-011-1, Published by Barricade Books Inc./New York. Dismas 13:14, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hi, this is in response to the message you sent.

While I agree most of the information in the previous article was useful, I doubt with the current, much more strict enforcement against using primary sources, or making claims that can't be verified by a non-self-published source (even if the information is completely true), it wouldn't be able to be added back to the article. Ralphael 19:48, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

{{rfd}}[edit]

When you add {{rfd}} to redirects, please do not replace the old redirect text, instead, just place the template above the redirect text. – AB CD 22:32, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

VfD help[edit]

Please, help at VfD of Ivan Cherevko. -- Mykola Petrenko 09:43, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

More schools on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion[edit]

As of March 25, 2005, there are an additional (6) articles listed for deletion under the POV notion that schools are non-notable (even though this is invalid reasoning as per the Wikipedia deletion policy). Please be aware that the following schools are actively being discussed and voted upon:

In response to this cyclical ordeal, a Schoolwatch programme has been initiated in order to indentify school-related articles which may need improvement and to help foster and encourage continued organic growth. Your comments are welcome and I thank you again for your time. --GRider\^talk

***************[edit]

Is *************** in fact a person? If so, who? Why would this mistake have been made? I'm reluctant to delete a page (without a VfD) without very good reason, as I hope you'll appreciate. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:54, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you reverted my making the page a redirect, without responding to my query. Some research suggests that there is at least some reason for thinking that you're wrong on this: [1]. You may well be right, and the Web-site wrong, but I do need more than your word before deleting the redirect page. Please leave that page alone until you've explained further (the edit history of the Stile article tells me nothing, I'm afraid, beyond the fact that the name was removed from it). Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:12, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

The nndb page provides evidence (proof is obviously going to be difficult). An anonymous posting denying the identification is surely less convincing than this? I'm not committed to keeping the page, and would be just as happy to see it settled either way, but I don't want to delete a page without being sure. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:19, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

No — that would mess up the redirect. If you want to have the redirect deleted, you can propose it on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion — instructions are on the page. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 19:09, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Click OK[edit]

Hi! you asked some time ago me to look Click OK article. As I'm not awaare of the band I don't have much to add. There's few thoughts I had when I was reading it:

Titles (of songs, etc) are written in Estonian only first letter is capitalized
In external links:
- For the photo it would be good to mention the site (and owner/photographer)
- First newspaper article is just bout car accident and how they were transported to hospital, in my opinion irrelevant for encyclopedia
- Second newspaper article is about First Estonian clubdance (go-go dance(?)) competition. And there is mentioned that 2 girls (Kariny Joala and Monika Mandre) from Click OK won. So this fact maybe will be suitable for article.

Hope this is any help for you. --TarmoK 18:47, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

{{RfC}} 2[edit]

You dropped a few RfC templates on some redirects you created that I don't believe you ever cleaned up after. Pages relating to Annita Pania. Did these get soumitted to RfD, and if they did, what was the outcome? You can request a speedy delete of items that you create and that only you have edited, within reason. humblefool ® 00:46, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mazzembly 1997[edit]

No, thanks to you. If you hadn't written in my talk page I'd have never remembered to remove the request from "Requested images" ;-) Sarg 12:21, 27 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hubba Bubba Bubble Gum soda[edit]

At Talk:Hubba Bubba Bubble Gum soda you asked about moving a web image to the wikipedia images. I don't think we can do that but I checked the link and it looks like the person who has the image is at email address peggy@promobilia.com so you could ask if we can have the picture. Assuming the email address isn't stale she might say yes. RJFJR 15:03, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

Copyright examination request[edit]

I moved my copyright examination request as instructed. I also left a comment at Wikipedia talk:Requested copyright examinations as to my reasoning for placing the request there.

--Tckma 19:35, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Attempt to delete Finnish musicians stub[edit]

Have you seen this discussion: Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion#.7B.7BFinland-musician-stub.7D.7D_.26_Cat:Finnish_musician_stubs?--Mais oui! 18:42, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Finland-writer-stub[edit]

I reverted the edits. Koti ei ole koti ilman saunaa. RCSB 22:32, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oddball[edit]

I , CyclePat, award Easyas12c with this Oddball Barnstar for the creation of the odd & unexpected article Fart fetish

--CyclePat 02:19, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copied to user page for now. This is the first barnstar I get. Thank you. --Easyas12c 21:32, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Examination - Talk:Kill,_I_Oughtta[edit]

I've closed your copyright examination at Talk:Kill,_I_Oughtta. The image qualifies as fair use. ~MDD 46 96 23:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great news. --Easyas12c 23:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FU rootkit[edit]

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Perfecto 23:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where exactly did I do so? --Easyas12c 23:56, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Those little annoying computer game images you added to tons of articles[edit]

You really, really, REALLY have to go through and remove all those tiny little stupid icons from that computer game from all the articles you put them on. That's just atrocious. Those serve absolutely no encyclopedic purpose whatsoever. As small as they are, I don;t think they'd have any purpose on the article about the game itself, but they sure as hell have no purpose being added to all the articles about folklore and mythology. I mean, come on, are all of these articles supposed to turn into image galleries for all the different versions of all the zillions of computer games that trivially happen to adapt that creature for the game? Use some common sense. DreamGuy 06:41, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many of these articles didn't have any pictures at all. I think they are making the articles better, else I would not have added them in the first place. And you have to note that these images are really free, so they are better than some fair use images. --Easyas12c 08:19, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The topics in question are historical and typically have tons of images available that are inpublic domain by age. Talking about fair use images is irrelevant. DreamGuy 16:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - Feel free to get better images then. --Easyas12c 11:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think it would make sense to add images of every fictional/real elephant to elephant article. I don't. But I do think it is wise to have few elephant pictures in the article.--Easyas12c 08:28, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Then get some that are RELEVANT and ENCYCLOPEDIC and LARGER and NOT FROM SOME STUPID ALMOST COMPLETELY UNHEARD OF COMPUTER GAME. Did you remove all those images yet? If you haven't, please do. I don't want to remove them all myself, but I will if I have to, because these images are clearly highly inappropriate. I mean, come on, get real. DreamGuy 16:57, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I will let the editors of the specific articles decide. If the images are inappropriate they will remove them. We don't need to do that by brute force based on one, or even two opinions. The pain of removing the images is still smaller than the pain of adding them. So, if you remove the images I have suffered more. If you want to decide this for every article by yourself, then it is your business. I won't revert your edits, if you are to remove the images. I had my posibility to suggest a change, now I leave it to the hands of evolution. --Easyas12c 11:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of these articles can be found at Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Wesnothunit --Easyas12c 11:43, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article listed for deletion[edit]

Hi Easyas12c,

I noticed from the Wikimedia Inclusionist page that you're an inclusionist, also, so I was wondering if you would be able to do me a huge favor and possibly place a vote here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ethnic slurs. I've been working on the article for months, and now they want to delete it. If you could, I would be greatly in your debt.

Best wishes,

Primetime 17:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Anytime you need a favor, let me know.--Primetime 20:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Anal jewelry[edit]

I don't understand the comment you left on my talk page. I didn't do anything to the article except put up a proposed deletion template because the article is only a dictionary definition. If you disagree with the proposed deletion, you can simply remove the template. Since your first language is Finnish, maybe you could translate the Finnish article into English to expand the English article beyond a dictionary definition. I'm not into piercing, and I don't know how important the practice of anal piercing is, but I suspect it's not a widespread or popular practice because of the obvious, serious health risks. All I had to go on was the minimal information in the current entry. No reply to this message is expected or desired. If you think the article is worth keeping, just remove the PROD tag and expand it. Anyone can remove a PROD tag for any reason. Brian G. Crawford 16:33, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Various artists album infobox[edit]

Template:Various artists album infobox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jogers (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mergeto template on Ubuntu Linux[edit]

You added Template:Mergeto on Ubuntu (Linux distribution)#CNR_for_Ubuntu some time ago. Would you please clarify on Talk:Ubuntu (Linux distribution) why you feel the section ought to be moved? It is not obvious to me. Twinxor t 08:17, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Afd: Moonfish (audio tracker)[edit]

I nominated an article that you created, Moonfish (audio tracker), for deletion. If you think that the article is salvagable, or that I'm mistaken, please comment on its deletion page. Please see the Guide to deletion if you have any questions about Wikipedia's deletion process. -- Vossanova 18:02, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Various artists albums: cfd[edit]

Uh, I guess we're coming to tear this down again. Seriously, though, we've pretty much decided against automatic sorting of album categories by {{Album infobox}} in the latest updates, in which we also made the chronology display optional and redirected the Various artists infobox. The discussion's here; honestly, I can't see that there's a need to group all these together. –Unint 04:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capitilized category[edit]

I replaced the category Finnish Keyboardists that you created, with Category:Finnish keyboardists and sent the old one to be speedy deleted. No other similar categories are named with a capital letter on the name on the instrument, so I decided to be brave and assume it was just a lapse of mind from your side. I will fix the interwiki on fiwiki, too. // Habj 19:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Amber Rose image[edit]

I returned the dvd image for now. It is better than nothing. However, note discussion at Talk:Amber_Rose_(porn_star)#picture --Easyas12c 09:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Humm.. I'm afraid it's not better than nothing. That use of a dvd cover violates the Wikipedia Fair Used policies. I'd say we better get rid of it. --Abu Badali 11:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now, that seems a valid point. We really should get one of the other pictures now. --Easyas12c 15:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Early registration for Wikimania 2006 is open until July 9. User:Spalding From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search

Hello, fellow Wikipedians! Contents [hide]

   * 1 My introduction to Wikipedia
   * 2 My interests
   * 3 My Wikipedia MO
   * 4 Some gushing!
   * 5 My latest toy
   * 6 What Wikipedia is not
   * 7 Nomination for Patron Saint of Wikipedia
   * 8 My CSS experiments and my small customization of my Wikipedia view
   * 9 WikiProjects
   * 10 Use of Javascript in the monobook.js page
   * 11 Useful links that I keep here for reference and as aids for editing
   * 12 Fairly obscure tips and tricks that are in the manual but I missed for too long

[edit]

My introduction to Wikipedia

I loved this site the minute I found it in a Google search. In fact, I just now caught myself looking for the edit tab when reading a normal web page that needed a little tweak, so I think I have a problem already! And the mouseovers on these wiki links, especially when renamed, remind me of Mr. Subliminal. [edit]

My interests

But seriously, my interests are engineering, especially human factors and usability, cognitive science, jazz, epistemology for dummies, pop science, nonfiction, especially science books, technical writing and mental models, collaboration as in Wikipedia and participatory design, consumer protection, and bicycling. [edit]

My Wikipedia MO

Here's my entry in the Wikipedia:new user log from August 2004. Since then my editing style (MO) has been mainly working on links - adding both internal and external ones (usually one of the first few on the first page of Google hits), and fixing broken ones - I HATE linkrot.

Recently in early 2005 I have noticed that, just as it often happens with the problem of keeping track of anything, there are often articles that are not linked to similar ones and it can lead to much repetition of similar articles under similar names, so lately I have been liberally adding internal links to connect articles in order to build the web. BTW, what is the common term for these links? Free links? Free-links? Wikilinks? Wiki-links? None of them has an article that I can find. This concept is similar to the need for a common glossary in technical writing, so that consistent names are used for the same thing. OK, on 6/3/2005 I found freelink and wikilink in Wikipedia:Glossary. That's better. So I created redirects to teh Wikipedia glossary for freelink, free-link, Wiki-link, and wikilink.

I also create stubs when I am struck with a thought. My watchlist has been growing and growing, since I leave my breadcrumb trail by using the default of watching edited pages. The watchlist is then watched for vandalism, spelling, typos, or anything strange. I am a fan of properly filling in edit summaries, and in pursuit of guidelines for them I just found this: Edit summary legend. [edit]

Some gushing!

I am very excited about Wikipedia, which in IMO is nearly as groundbreaking as the web itself as the embodiment of the ideals of Vannevar Bush and Tim Berners-Lee on making accumulated human knowledge so accessible that the mechanics of retrieving it doesn't get in the way of thinking, or in other words, it has flow. In February 2005 I joined the m:Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians after thinking that one of my long articles had been deleted! And in August 2005, I discovered and joined the Wikipedia:Harmonious editing club. [edit]

My latest toy

Dillo - I just discovered this wonderful piece of software when commissioning my Linux toy, an old PC brought back to life for web surfing. An old Cyrix 686 processor (first with 32 MB, now 160 MB of EDO memory) can now surf like lightning, thanks to Red Hat Linux plus two pieces of minimalist software - the Blackbox window manager, and Dillo. (Although lately since adding that memory it works just fine with the very nice Gnome desktop). I was especially impressed with performance on Wikipedia compared to some other computers I have used. While Dillo only does sites with simple html, no Java programming language or https, and is hit or miss with javascript, it seems to have no problem with php. A nice feature is built in html syntax checking - almost all web sites have some errors. [edit]

What Wikipedia is not

As I expanded this use page, I wondered if I was starting to blog here, and violate the Wikipedia is not a soapbox policy. I don't really think so. On an initial perusal of the guidelines for user pages, I think I'm ok, since this info is mostly Wikipedia-related along with a small amount of personal info. Any opinions?

   Hi Spalding - Brookie here - I think you're okay on your musing - it's albout you on the Wiki which seems fine to Me! Brookie 15:55, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Nomination for Patron Saint of Wikipedia

It just has to be Cliff Clavin! Dontcha think? [edit]

My CSS experiments and my small customization of my Wikipedia view

I sometimes have lost edits because I forgot to do the final save after successive Previews. I think the problem was partially banner blindness, but mostly that the "NOTE: This is only a preview and has not yet been saved" message was too small and blended in with the article text. So with the help of some good Wikipedians on the Village Pump Assistance page, I was able to make the notice big (and also blinking on Firefox, IE doesn't support blink). Now if I miss it, shame on me. Here's the line in my monobook.css, along with the development ones that didn't quite work. Note: I had to revise it for changes in MediaWiki 1.5 in June 2005.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Spalding/monobook.css

[edit]

WikiProjects

I think WikiProject Red Link Recovery is a good cause and WikiProject, because I have often found red links that are very easily fixed, usually because there is already an article with a slightly different capitalization, plural, or some similar small difference. I know that Wikipedia usually has an article (at least a stub) for almost any possible fairly common subject, word, or phrase, so very often I find wonderful articles that are just a small correction away from a red link in any given article, and I want to do as much as possible to prevent myself and others from wasting time and effort trying to reinvent the wheel.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Usability is another one I recently joined. There is also Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories. [edit]

Use of Javascript in the monobook.js page

I copied and pasted this suggestion from User:ABCD on Wikipedia_talk:Edit summary#Forcing summaries to force an edit summary to prevent inadvertently leaving it blank, since I usually intend to fill it in with descriptive text as a courtesy to others that are watching it. I tried it both as something nice to have and to get experience in Wikipedia Javascript customizing via the User:Spalding/monobook.js page.

The biggest problem in getting this to work was getting the browser cache refreshed. For Firefox, control-reload didn't seem to do it, it took control-shift-R. And it seems to wear out and need to be redone fairly often. There is obviously still a detail of this browser cache stuff that I still don't understand. [edit]

Useful links that I keep here for reference and as aids for editing

   * WP:MOS, WP:LAYOUT, WP:EP, Wikipedia:Links, Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) - Guidelines for my most frequent Wikipedia activities, starting with the grand pubah, the Manual of Style, the critical Guide to Layout, then working with internal and external links
   * Wikipedia:Featured articles - I often wonder why there isn't a nice sample article for help in formatting, writing, etc., and then duh, I remember that is what featured articles are.
   * Wikipedia:Categories and Wikipedia:Categorization projects (current) - I have avoided categories so far after an initial burst of enthusiasm that was quickly squelched by confusion and disillusionment, but I think they are potentially good. The main problem as I see it is that every article can potentially be in very many categories which gets too messy, IMO, so I will peruse these for the categorization philosophy (1-3 categories per article? I don't know) as time permits before getting involved again.
   * Wikipedia:Wikiquette - Hey, can't hurt!
   * American and British English spelling differences - To help separate misspellings from American-British differences
   * Wikipedia:Build the web - one of the best features of Wikipedia is the interconnectedness of all things (within reason)
   * m:Wikipedia_sociology- Interesting.

[edit]

Fairly obscure tips and tricks that are in the manual but I missed for too long

These are all documented somewhere in the Wikipedia:Project_namespace namespace, but I put them here for quick reference.

  1. Comments can be included right on an article page by enclosing them as shown:  . A good use of this is to warn to check the talk page first when there is a section that is contentious and has been the subject of edit wars. To see the example comment that is embedded in this section, go to page edit mode. Actually this is documented in the very basic Wikipedia:How to edit a page, so it is a good example of RTFM, but the Wikipedia manual ain't no Mac instruction manual!
  2. A pipe "|" symbol may be used to strip off the parenthetical part of a link and/or a prefix such as Wiktionary: or Wikipedia: or m:. An example is instruction manual used above to display instruction manual. Also useful for Wiktionary links - in that case it strips off the Wiktionary prefix.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Spalding" Views

   * User page
   * Discussion

Proposal on Notability[edit]

Because you're a member of the Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians, I'm notifying you that the inclusionist proposa Wikipedia:Non-notabilityl is in progress to define the role of notability in articles. Please help us make this successful! Also note the proposal Wikipedia:Importance is a deletionist proposla that seeks to officially introduce notabiltiy for the first time. Make sure this is defeated! --Ephilei 04:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Linux[edit]

In case you're interested. Regards, Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu thanks[edit]

To User:Localzuk, User:Twinxor, User:Easyas12c

Just wanted to say well done for your contributions to Ubuntu (Linux distribution), which were important in getting it to FA status, and for being involved on its FA day and/or the aftermath. It's always so much better working with a group of people towards a common goal than walking the walk alone. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 13:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image talk:Ncurve2.gif[edit]

I reverted your edit to the copyright status of this image because you did not provide a reason for doing so. If you want to discuss it, please do so, but do not simply change the status because you feel like it. If you have a good reason for doing so, then explain why. Chris53516 19:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not edit its copyright status. I rejected the copyright examination, as the problem does not fall into the pool of problems that copyright examinations deal with. Please read the rejection template (the one that you removed by reverting) carefully. --Easyas12c 19:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then where on Earth is it supposed to go? The image is from a webpage and it has a copyright problem. Therefore, I requested copyright review. It sounds like it's the right place to me. Chris53516 20:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From Wikipedia:Requested copyright examinations:

This page is a forum for requesting co-examination of copyright and licensing of content with other Wikipedians before it is included in a Wikipedia article, or to request such co-examination of copyright and licensing of an image ~~before the image is uploaded to Wikipedia~~. (emphasis changed)

I want to use the image in an article. It's already been uploaded, but that still fits with the above description. Unless I'm totally lost and confused, this image seems to fit in the {{Template:copyrightexamination}}. Chris53516 20:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anal Jewellery[edit]

Apologies - misread the thread and thought it should have gone back to the redirect, sorry --Nigel ^(Talk) 19:37, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks for apologing. It took courage from me to revert the article again. --Easyas12c 18:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Examining Christine Smith[edit]

The text at the top of Wikipedia:Requested copyright examinations says "Fair use checking should also be directed here". So why was Christine Smith, a dispute about fair use, listed as unsuitable for requested copyright examinations. Did I misunderstand what was meant by "here"? Andjam 07:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have no idea how that got into the page. Keeping the forum preinclusion has really been a pain. This is probaly because people don't dare to mark stuff copyright violations, when they are unsure about it. How ever thats not a reason for bugging the copyright examinations. I hope removing that unclear statement will help the project in its goals. I also plan to move rejected entries to a subpage, so no one can accidentially come to think they are correct entries. --Easyas12c 07:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move done. --Easyas12c 07:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Enter versus Return[edit]

Hi. I noticed you're listed as the author of [Image:Enter.png|Enter.png], showing the difference between 'enter' and 'return'. I'm not so sure there is such a clear cut difference. Certainly there's no widely respected standard: even older (IBM!) keyboards mix the labels. In hardware, the two keys generate the same keycode on the port (28) - some keyboard controllers use the extended code the keypad enter generates to distinguish between the two, but this varies widely from system to system: testing in C/C++ under Windows and Linux shows the two keys generate the same response (0x0a). MacOS, according to others, differentiates between the two, which I can't test myself. I just think it's not as simple a matter as one being return and one being enter, when on the majority of computers I've tested on you can't tell from userland code.

What are your thoughts on the matter. Do you have evidence to the contrary: I'm not totally certain of my conclusions. I've posted my thoughts on the matter at Talk:Carriage_return if you'd like to join in the discussion. --Dom 11:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Heidi Vahakallio[edit]

Heidi Puurulan aikaisempi sukunimi on ihan oikeasti Vahakallio eikä Vähäkallio. Katso fi:Keskustelu:Vera. JIP | Talk 10:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kas. --Easyas12c 13:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibooks BOTM and COTM[edit]

We've started a discussion to shelve the BOTM and COTM initiatives for the month of december. I've listed a number of reasons why, and there is some good support so far. Since you are an active voter for these things, I recommend you come give your two cents. The discussion is on the wikibooks staff lounge. --wikibooks:User:Whiteknight 02:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calling for a inclusionist opinions on the two notable articles up for AfD[edit]

These two articles are up for AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chicken and Rice and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hallo Berlin

I hope you'll agree with me! Chicken and Rice has been cited by multiple indepedent sources, has a huge cult following, and has been nominated by Vendy Awards, a notable award in NYC.

Hallo Berlin (not as large a cult following), but even more coverage, and Won the Vendy Awards! Valoem ^talk 05:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected Portland Trailblazers logo request[edit]

You deleted a copyright examination in Wikipedia:Requested copyright examinations. Fine. But why? —EncMstr 19:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I rejected it because it was about content already in Wikipedia and Copyright Examinations is a preinclusion forum. The request can currently be found at Template:Rejected copyright examinations which is also included from Wikipedia:Copyright problems page. --Easyas12c 19:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FluffertraX[edit]

A tag has been placed on FluffertraX, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:FluffertraX. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 ^Talk 05:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:-( --Easyas12c 12:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Horemans[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Mark Horemans, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 12:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bondage[edit]

You are a sick, sick bastard. How can you find these sexual traits acceptable?????

Please reply on my talk page.
Regards, A thoroughly disgusted Zesty Prospect 16:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who ever said I find them acceptable? Then again, someone who read your comment might think that you find them unacceptable. This being the case, you should thank me and my fellow Wikipedians for going trough and organizing all this information. It is useful to know your enemy. So we really save BDSM haters lot of time and trouble. They may not even have to see anything that really disgusts them. Still they can have all the related information available. --Easyas12c 20:57, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ha ha, cheers blud. Do you actually find it acceptable though? =]

kind regards, Zesty Prospect 15:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd look for a block warning for comments like Zesty P.'s

I don't know what place he comes from, but where I was raised, he's at the edge of the law about discrimination of people's sexual orientation...

...Just for the info... --G®iffen 19:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My main man Zesto doesn't mention sexual orientation. It's a bit weird though for people to write these articles on Wikipedia. They must be either be a loser who has had sex once or a weird Sex God or they could try to help people about sex information. For instance I saw my friend try to finger his girlfriend's anus to day. Unfortunately her trousers were up. All the best if you want to help. You sick lonely weird bastard if not. Soopa hoops77 16:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rejected copyright examination[edit]

Can you tell me why you removed my question about Image:Jeffrey Goldblum.jpg [2].--Paloma Walker 01:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See explanation at Image talk:Jeffrey Goldblum.jpg. Feel free to ask again, if you still don't understand it afterwards. I hope your question finds the correct place and gets answered. --Easyas12c 23:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mutella[edit]

I have redirected Mutella to a page of historical Gnutella clients. Other people were complaining about the number of entries for Gnutella clients. I think the information is short enough to be merged. If you have time to examine what I have done, that would be appreciated. Bpringlemeir 18:43, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Click OK albums[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Click OK albums, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Click OK albums has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Click OK albums, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 05:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Foot girl[edit]

Foot girl, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Foot girl satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foot girl and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Foot girl during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Spitting fetishism[edit]

Spitting fetishism, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Spitting fetishism satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spitting fetishism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Spitting fetishism during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 20:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Amber Rose (porn star)[edit]

An editor has nominated Amber Rose (porn star), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Rose (porn star) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:14, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Salarakas[edit]

I have nominated Salarakas, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salarakas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rtphokie (talk) 01:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amphibious Assault[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Amphibious Assault, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 10:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of HaXXXor[edit]

I have nominated HaXXXor, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HaXXXor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Salarakkaat (album)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Salarakkaat (album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salarakkaat (album). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Reverend X (talk) 18:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Wille Hartonen[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wille Hartonen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Reverend X (talk) 11:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Credence logo.png listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Credence logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 72.43.24.86 (talk) 14:38, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm![edit]

I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 10:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pov Pervert 5[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pov Pervert 5, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pov Pervert 5. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? IRK!_{Leave me a note or two} 01:47, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of XBIZ Award[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article XBIZ Award, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

List cruft

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Blowdart | ^talk 21:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Vulva Original[edit]

A tag has been placed on Vulva Original, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 20:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 21:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Easy...I have done a little work on the Vulva Original article. I think the odor cues convinced me to expand it and make it more available to a wider audience. The scientific qualities of this product are worth investigating and certainly worth an article in an encyclopedia.--Buster7 (talk) 14:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron[edit]

I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 01:05, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Example of a zipper[edit]

I looked at the "Zipper (data structure)" article last night at this revision. When I looked at it, I saw the long digression on basic type theory concepts, didn't notice your example just before it, and thought that the type theory was being presented as the example. I removed both sections, thinking that I was removing only one, and then wrote my own example. It turned out to be the same as yours, although I went a bit further into the details of how to the zipper is derived from the original type. I tried to pull in some of your text when I realized the mistake, but I didn't see how. Just wanted you to know what happened. WillOakland (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Heidi Puurula[edit]

I have nominated Heidi Puurula, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Puurula. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Peripitus (Talk) 23:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Maria Kekkonen[edit]

I have nominated Maria Kekkonen, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Kekkonen. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TheoloJ (talk) 16:15, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Salarakkaat[edit]

The article Salarakkaat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:MUSIC, no other indication group might meet the GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Easyas12c! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Niilo Paasivirta - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Maria Kekkonen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Martina Aitolehti - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Raven De La Croix - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of Template:Copycontrol[edit]

Template:Copycontrol is being discussed at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. You are invited to comment. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:46, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rakel Liekki[edit]

I have nominated Rakel Liekki, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakel Liekki. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. EuroPride (talk) 12:51, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smotherbox for deletion[edit]

The article Smotherbox is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smotherbox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Merrill Stubing (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bondage hook for deletion[edit]

The article Bondage hook is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bondage hook until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Merrill Stubing (talk) 07:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anni Lippert[edit]

A tag has been placed on Anni Lippert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Winner 42 Talk to me! 13:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wired mandala for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wired mandala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wired mandala until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Finger armor ring for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finger armor ring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finger armor ring until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 20:18, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phials of Acid Jazz for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phials of Acid Jazz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phials of Acid Jazz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 20:23, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Women Are from Venus, Men from Anus for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Women Are from Venus, Men from Anus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women Are from Venus, Men from Anus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 20:29, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Skitso Productions[edit]

The article Skitso Productions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable; zero gnews hits, zero gbooks hits, zero RS refs.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 20:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Point of view pornography for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Point of view pornography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Point of view pornography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Back in Bu$ine$$ for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Back in Bu$ine$$ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back in Bu$ine$$ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Outi Alanne for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Outi Alanne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outi Alanne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PornDigger! for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PornDigger! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PornDigger! (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:07, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PH-balanced cosmetic for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PH-balanced cosmetic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PH-balanced cosmetic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:22, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lemmentykki for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lemmentykki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lemmentykki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 23:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of L'Album for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article L'Album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 05:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Älä osta; varasta for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Älä osta; varasta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Älä osta; varasta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 05:57, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lula games for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lula games is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lula games until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 06:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Riittäähän noita linnassa for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riittäähän noita linnassa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riittäähän noita linnassa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 06:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mitä tarkoittaa rakas for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitä tarkoittaa rakas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitä tarkoittaa rakas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 07:59, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Back in Bu$ine$$[edit]

A tag has been placed on Back in Bu$ine$$ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lemmentykki[edit]

A tag has been placed on Lemmentykki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Älä osta; varasta[edit]

A tag has been placed on Älä osta; varasta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Noitalinna huraa![edit]

A tag has been placed on Noitalinna huraa! requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Epeefleche (talk) 08:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walter de Camp[edit]

The article Walter de Camp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:BIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 11:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of XBIZ Award for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XBIZ Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XBIZ Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Proteus[edit]

A tag has been placed on DJ Proteus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of XRCO Award for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article XRCO Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XRCO Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 12:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shay Sweet for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shay Sweet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shay Sweet (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Space Dude[edit]

The article Space Dude has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, no good sourcing found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:55, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Space Dude for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Space Dude is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Dude (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of XBIZ Award[edit]

A tag has been placed on XBIZ Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chrisw80 (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ingredient-E124[edit]

Template:Ingredient-E124 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ingredient-E211[edit]

Template:Ingredient-E211 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:45, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ingredient-E414[edit]

Template:Ingredient-E414 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:E-ingredient[edit]

Template:E-ingredient has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ingredient-E422[edit]

Template:Ingredient-E422 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:46, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hubba Bubba soda[edit]

The article Hubba Bubba soda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amisom (talk) 09:02, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vulva Original[edit]

The article Vulva Original has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 12:56, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vulva Original for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vulva Original is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vulva Original (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 12:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vulva Original[edit]

A tag has been placed on Vulva Original requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 13:13, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fi.AIW[edit]

Hello, I'm the founder of the italian branch of AIW. I read that you are my finnish corrispective so I'd like to present to you the inclusionist logo for the finnish section I draw

I used, as for the italian version, the colours of your flag and i put a small textline saying: Suomalainen haara (I hope it is correct, I used google translate). I wasn't able to translate Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians in finnish but I noticed the title you choose for the finnish branch is unaltered: so, if you want i can translate (with your hel) the circular line around the logo in finnish, otherwise, i hope you enjoy the version i made. Ciao--Bruce The Deus (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kudos (album) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kudos (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kudos (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vmavanti (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Link language[edit]

Template:Link language has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 11:07, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anton Maiden[edit]

The article Anton Maiden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Edea (musical group) albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Edea (musical group) albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Velcra albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Velcra albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:41, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Copyrightexaminationrejected[edit]

Template:Copyrightexaminationrejected has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:34, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Amphibious Assault (band) albums[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Amphibious Assault (band) albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]