User talk:Frieda

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey Frieda :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay.

Some links that may be of use:

Have fun, keep contributing :) Dysprosia 08:38, 30 Sep 2003 (UTC)


File:Diwalipuja.jpg

I wish you All The Best on the occasion of the Indian festival of light, Diwali. I am sure that the light of hope, confidence, and all positive attributes shall always remain inside you – lighting your path and guiding you to attain higher and higher levels of excellence in all your endevours! All the best!
Buon Diwali :-))) --g 00:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

Dear Frieda, congratulations to be winner of Board elections 2007. Many wishes to your next work. --Snek01 20:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Saracen Joust, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.lifeinitaly.com/tourism/tuscany/horse-jousting.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello bot :-) You're right, but I've an OTRS ticket releasing that text in GFDL.

Frieda (talk) 11:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Buon Natale, Frieda!

Babbo Natale (talk) 19:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Foundation non-free image deadline[edit]

Hi there. Please see:

I also wonder if you would be able to advise on the best way to get clarification of the Foundation Licensing policy? The points I've raised here concern historical images and some mentions I've seen of a deadline. What I've said over there is as follows:

"[What] about this bit of the policy? "Such EDPs must be minimal. Their use, with limited exception, should be to illustrate historically significant events..." - it says right there: "to illustrate historically significant events". [...] Also, I've seen people say that there is a deadline of "March 23, 2008" to sort all this out, but in fact that deadline is currently written as a subclause of point 6. ie. It only applies to projects without an EDP. "For the projects which currently do not have an EDP in place, the following action shall be taken [...] By March 23, 2008, all existing files under an unacceptable license as per the above must either be accepted under an EDP, or shall be deleted." This may just be a mistake in the layout of the Licensing Policy, but if this is so, it needs to be changed and the change widely advertised."

As well as the 'deadline' confusion, my concern is also over historical images. I would be grateful if you could bring these points to the attention of the board if this needs clarification.

The above was written in August 2007 (the bit about historical images can be ignored for the moment - it is the deadline that needs clarification at board level) and left here, but got no response (as far as I can tell). For obvious reasons, it would be good if you, or other members of the Wikimedia Board of Trustees, could comment at the Administrators' noticeboard discussion, or find your way to where-ever the discussion ends up. I've notified the other Board Members where they have en-wiki user pages. Carcharoth (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Frieda. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Frieda. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from userPage[edit]

@Frieda: hi there - I notice that you are quite high up in Wiki so wonder whether you could give me some advice & assistance, if necessary. Earlier today, I updated the Wiki page for Sir Alan Yarrow in all languages (including Italian: Sir Alan Yarrow) to reflect his appointment as a Knight Bachelor in the New Year's Honours List. I then attempted to clean up my Talk Page with a view to starting 2016 afresh, but by doing this simple task I have now been landed with a 36-hour ban. Also my comment about archiving old discussions has been deleted - is this how Italian Wikipedia treats people who are keen to provide it with good info? I await your reply, and please advise how I can delete my entire entry on Italian Wiki if matters cannot be dealt with satisfactorily. Many thanks. M Mabelina (talk) 10:58, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Frieda - I know silence is supposed to be golden, but I hadn't realised by quite how much to Italian Wikipedians! I have responded to Gac and look forward to hearing from you both. Happy New Year. Best M Mabelina (talk) 00:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

moved on 10:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC) by  Klaas `Z4␟` V