User talk:Rabadur
I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:
For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.
(Sam Spade | talk | contributions) 11:18, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Dear Rabadur,
- I hope I am not breaking any Wiki-rule by writting here: I suppose this is the talk page you told me to write in... :-/
- Thank you very much for your warm welcome (different from that of ...) and for the suggestions and links. Thank you also for fixing that problem with the link--although I thought I had already fixed it. :-\
- I am really concern to learn to use Wikipedia in the proper way. I find it a very honest, deep, interesting effort to put things orderly to the reach of someone... and have some fun meanwhile. My intervention in the Opus Dei article was (por tried to be) honest, and my only problem is my general clumsiness with Wikipedia. I hope I will fix this soon.
- Thank you, again. Hasta luego. --Uncertain 09:41, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
- See the bibliography in the article on Opus Dei and Involvement in Far-Right Politics (if so you wish). Thank you for your flowers on my Engllsh skills... I would like, I would like. Bye. --Uncertain 09:41, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit[edit]
Please refrain from posting sarcastic provocations on my talk page. Pvazz 09:55, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Ending Statement for Opus Dei[edit]
I don't know that a statement is even necessary in the encyclopedic prose preferred at wikipedia. Any ending statement that basically says "evaluation of opus dei requires consideration of a number of controversial factors" not only sounds like a statement of the obvious (especially at the end of the article), but also doesn't really serve to add any new information. It's my feeling that some other articles don't include this kind of statement, but if you're going for featured article status, maybe you should read through some of those to find out if a closing statement is necessary.
Also, I'm not sure about Wikipedia policy concerning the inclusion of links to books at Amazon.com in the article. I think links to independent reviews are of course allowed, but links to vendors are generally not.
The article was an interesting lunch read! Good luck with it. I saw in the news where Opus Dei is demanding something from the Da Vinci Code for its representation...might be of interest in the article, I don't know. Turly-burly 06:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)