Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fursecution

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 23:03, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

Fursecution

Delete. Unstable neologism, and has no potential to become encyclopedic. --Andylkl 06:43, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect and merge into Furry. RickK 06:51, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: I disagree with that, there is no information from the article worth merging. --Andylkl 07:00, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

Should be changed to a dictionary entry.

• The above from User:24.8.202.203. Merge and redirect to Furry. RickK 07:04, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: 576 Google hits do not maketh a dictionary entry. By the way, you voted once already, RickK. --Andylkl 07:10, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
    • Whoops, sorry about that, my connection died as I was posting the above, and I didn't think it took. RickK 07:11, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete neologism. Gazpacho 09:11, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, neologism, no evidence of widespread use. Average Earthman 10:32, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete minor neologism, apparently mostly a joke from one forum. CDC (talk) 19:23, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.