Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GWer

Article GWer listed on WP:VFD May 1 to May 7 2004, consensus was to delete. Discussion:

Seems to be an irrelevant partisan invention of a Bush hater. Get-back-world-respect 17:52, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bushism -- Cyrius|&#9998 18:56, May 1, 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, the info should be moved to Bushism. Kingturtle 04:13, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete outright. Someone came up with a mildly-cute bit of wordplay and had nowhere better to display it. If it wasn't the article author, he/she's not far from the original source. TB 22:45, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 23:32, 1 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Only relevant Google hit is to the Wikipedia article. I don't even like it much. How is it supposed to be pronounced? Gee-double-you-er? Gee-doubler? Not felicitious, not funny, and (the only important thing) no evidence of significant use. Dpbsmith 01:19, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey, if you come up with a new term and you want it to catch on, you have to try posting it somewhere. It was not meant to be funny.
Delete. --Samuel J. Howard 02:47, 2 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Lame private joke. Alcarillo 15:25, 3 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
- Private joke? It was neither private or a joke. : ) Kingturtle 04:13, 4 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

End discussion