User talk:MassGalactusUniversum
| Hello MassGalactusUniversum, you have received this notice because you have placed your name on the list of members of WikiProject Metal. We are currently looking to make the wikiproject more active, and in doing so, we need to have a list of active members on the wikiproject. If you wish to stay an active part of wikiproject metal, please add your username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Active Users. Conversely, if you wish to leave the wikiproject, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Metal/Members. Thank you. | 
|
Seniors and myki[edit]
Been watching your oversight of the myki page. Good work.
Just wanted to comment on the Seniors myki card issue. What kendo 66 posted is true. Seniors haven't received their promised free cards yet. In my case, that's definitely original research, at a personal level. But it's hard to find an "acceptable" reference. I did find a couple of blog and forum mentions. It's that classic situation of trying to find a reference telling us that something hasn't happened. The media tends not to work that way.
Sometimes Wikipedia's rules can be a bit frustrating.
[I also appreciate that kendo 66 still has a bit to learn about editing here. Might stick something on his talk page.] HiLo48 (talk) 04:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
- I understand what you're saying; but I don't feel there's much I can do about it. I will perhaps be happy to be a little less militant on the issue; if the info resurfaces I will perhaps settle with tagging it with a 'citation needed' and see if anyone can find anything. Jwoodger (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Declined CSD-G1 on Template talk:Book rationale[edit]
I removed the CSD-G1 on the above page because it just appeared screwed up because someone had vandalized the text. I removed the offending text so that it should now appear like a valid talk page for the template. Thanks--Mike Cline (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Talkback[edit]
Message added 17:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ukexpat (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Your warning[edit]
Mind your own business. This is not your issue and you have no power over me. If I'm banned I come back again and again under a different IP address so you're wasting your time with your puerile threats. Go buy a pizza and watch a TV program instead. NiceOneCyril (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Just an FYI...[edit]
Per this rollback, you restored an article that had been blanked. I just happen to see it was a newly created article that was blanked by the author. As such, it would have been tagable as {{db-blanked}}: "This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion as a page where the author of the only substantial content has requested deletion in good faith, either explicitly or by blanking the page. See CSD G7". Not saying you did anything wrong - just something to consider down the road. Thanks for all the positive contributions! Avicennasis @ 07:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I felt that I may have been too hasty with that one as soon as I did it. Cheers for the advice :) Jwoodger (talk) 02:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my User page. -- Boing! said Zebedee 11:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
The Last Remnant[edit]
It took eight minutes from announcing you would review the GAN to passing the article, which seems odd to me. For a proper review you have to look at/read the sources too, so please do this if you do another review. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 08:51, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, sorry - that was because I neglected to place 'currently being reviewed' tag on the queue page until after I had gone through it (being my first review). My actual review took just over an hour, but I will remember to do this important part first in the future, cheers Jwoodger (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
GA Review of Paint Ball[edit]
Reviewer — Nascar1996 22:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
The article I think is up to GA status, but few sections are not so I passed it. --Nascar1996 23:43, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Big thanks![edit]
Thanks for undoing vandalism on my userpage, much appreciated! Mouse Nightshirt | talk 13:32, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Deletion nomination of Talk:T68 Paintball Marker[edit]
Hi Jwoodger, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Talk:T68 Paintball Marker. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{db-author}}. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{db-author}} tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=FrescoBot}} somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot (msg) 00:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Deletion nomination of Talk:Tippmann alpha black[edit]
Hi Jwoodger, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Talk:Tippmann alpha black. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{db-author}}. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{db-author}} tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=FrescoBot}} somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot (msg) 00:43, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Otto Salomon[edit]
Hey there. I noticed you made the above into a redirect. I believe that there is enough info/sources out there to make it into its own standalone article (two examples: [1], and [2] plus all the other refs that can be found of him here: [3]). The redirect is fair (since it mentiones him in it) but I believe an article in the end would be best. I would do it but I am no expert and would not do as good a job as others. Cheers!Calaka (talk) 14:06, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I am in the same boat as you in regards to not being an expert. Of course, there is no time limit on anything. If someone decides to write an article about Salomon, then the page can be changed to be about him rather than just a redirect. Cheers Jwoodger (talk) 08:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
This is still pending at Good Article Reassessment. The view i have expressed there is, if the existing references could be fixed, it would be a keep. There is still a heap of refs without publisher / website owner / accessdate etc info. I fixed a few. Any chance you could tackle the rest? Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Old Melbourne Gaol[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Old Melbourne Gaol at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nsk92 (talk) 17:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well done, interesting article YellowMonkey (new photo poll) 07:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Introduction to mathematics of general relativity[edit]
Jwoodger, you nominated Introduction to mathematics of general relativity to move to Wikiversity. I have been working on rewriting it to actually be an introduction (rather than the math-pile it was when I started). I looked at Wikiversity's intro page, but I'm not really clear what the difference is. Could you clear up for me what exactly Wikiversity is and why you feel that article qualifies? Please post your response at the article's talk page in the section I created for this topic. (In the future, it's probably a good idea to post at the article's talk page when placing the tag.) Thank you, D O N D E groovily Talk to me 05:05, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Melbourne meetup this Saturday[edit]
|
Melbourne Meetup
|
 | |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 04:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users in Category:Wikipedians in Melbourne)
Melbourne meetup[edit]
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 04:39, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 04:28, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26[edit]
 | Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:34, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2013[edit]
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 6, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2013
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2013, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, MassGalactusUniversum. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Level 3 (TV series) for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Level 3 (TV series), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Level 3 (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |