Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stranger in Us All
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was listed on WP:CP. Joyous 18:27, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
Stranger in Us All[edit]
I haven't the faintest clue what this article is on about. Possible some of it could be salvaged and merged into Ritchie Blackmore, but I have no idea what. — Asbestos | Talk 23:22, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I have CSD'ed. It's unacceptable. --Neigel von Teighen 23:25, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, trivial, article does not establish notability. Megan1967 23:46, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. Any album by Blackmore is notable. Andrewa 00:02, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete the tale of ranting geezers. Wyss 00:43, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The formatting on this is definitely not wikipedia (I'm not sure it's worth trying ot fix). A lot of it is opinion, making this an essay. I'd say merge to Ritchie Blackmore (which could use the addition) if anyone is willing to do the work of reading this article. RJFJR 01:34, Feb 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Always ... always ... always check for copyright infringement first, before listing on VFD, especially if the article has at the bottom a hyperlink to the web site where the original article was published, as this one did. Listed at WP:CP. Uncle G 08:23, 2005 Feb 14 (UTC)
- Thanks for finding that. To be fair, I had assumed copyright, but copying-and-pasting the text into Google still finds nothing. The epinions text must not be searched, or something. The link at the bottom of the page wasn't the page the review is directly from either. Anyway, should have looked harder. — Asbestos | Talk 17:55, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.