Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remote backup

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - kept - SimonP 14:26, May 17, 2005 (UTC)

Remote backup[edit]

advertising. They are just trying to get you to go to their site. If it is worth keeping, then it at least needs to be cleared of any advertising.--Silversmith 18:20, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth keeping, while improving the article and stripping advertising. Samaritan 19:35, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, cleanup and expand. Appears to have some notability. Megan1967 04:17, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep, encyclopedic topic, the current article is a reasonable start. I took out the external link. Kappa 07:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That is not remote backup, it's a biased view for one type of remote backup. I suspect that you could actually correct this article and then move to Wikionary since that should be all that's needed. Vegaswikian 08:06, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, replace with redirect to backup. R adiant _* 12:24, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
Keep subt type of backup. Klonimus 17:58, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redirect backup. Whig 07:36, 13 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.