User talk:Dontbeakakke

dontbeakakke's TALK PAGE! NO DELETINGz0rz!

--sébastien 08:39, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)dontbeakakke 's TALK PAGE! NO DELETINGz0rz!--sébastien 08:39, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) --sébastien 08:39, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) $1+1=2$

Marimba Image Copyright

Hi again. This is your talk page, for other users who wish to discuss things with you; your personal user page is at User:Dontbeakakke.

I'm repeating the point I raised earlier since you still haven't clarified it: please add source and copyright information on Image:Ym6000a marimba.JPG. See Wikipedia:Images and Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for more details about how to mark this. Note that images without information may be deleted in the future. Thanks for your attention, -- Infrogmation 07:10, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Honestly, I have no idea how to find the copyright information. I can tell you that I got the picture from this website:[[1]]. It's no problem if it's deleted, as long as it isn't replaced by something like what was there before. Before, there was an ugly picture that would not do justice to this majestic instrument.

sébastien 4:18 PM (PDT), April 12, 2005 --sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

So apparently this is my talk page

--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) --sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) so apparently this is my talk page--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

and im not allowed to delete anything, because infrogmation will get mad--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) --sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) --sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) --sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC) thats lame--sébastien 08:37, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

Quite honestly, all I really want is a Contents box

I really wanted a "Contents Box" (or whatever) and I finlly got one! Ugh, tão contente! Please visit my talk page now, and leave me comments (or else) --sébastien 22:05, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

Llll

Hey Nathan. Those jerks who want to delete Japanese nouns are just kakkes. They can go masturbate in a dustbin. Hm. --Node 07:00, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

indeed. Can't they realize what kakkes they really are? I mean, puh-leaze! Kakkeage to the mizzax. Anyway, their feeble minds will never realize how feeble their minds are. それから、同性愛生活は楽しくて忙しいですね?　　What, with Michael Phelps out there and all...　　--sébastien 07:04, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

What are those um, red ink-dipped Japanese/Chinese name stamps that have the kanji written in Seal Script and which are used for "Signatures" on fancy documents etc.?

So what are they called? I have no idea. Furthermore, how do I get one? --sébastien 06:06, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

They're usually called hanko (はんこ、「判子」は当て字); the formal term is inkan (印鑑)...just in case you're still wondering. :) RJCraig 09:47, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

　れsポンセと酔うrめっさげ　

へっぉなてゃん、いごってぇめっさげよウェftふぉr目恩my他lk派下。井戸の他ppれし当てようrst論gでぇちお日展電子絵sべかうせいはてでぇちおにsつぁんっでぇちおにsmヴェry無ch。ふぉ両輪ふぉr町恩、てぇぽぃcッ様面地尾にsのねぃsたんたんでょぺ鋪llyゐっぁゎysべ。いいllはヴェ様rふみぃty。鋪c今日。ぉヴェ、Node

Esperanto

Maybe this isn't my business, but why don't you like esperanto?Cameron Nedland 15:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just don't like it

I think the -oj and -aj sounds for plural nouns/adjectives are really ugly.
The attempt to include sounds from many languages seems excessive, and not conducive to ease of communication of people from different language backgrounds as an international auxiliary language
The inclusion of case is superfluous considering how many people just use the sentence order of their native language (SVO usually).
Why do adjectives agree with the noun for number but the definite article La doesn't?
The verb forms are hopelessly simple and yet the table of demonstrative/other pronouns seems to go on forever.
Vocabulary seems to be derived randomly from either a Germanic or Romance base with no logic behind it.
"Fake" language history (saying that "ci used to be in common use but now people just use vi" ... parallel to "thou"?) Come on, Zamenhof
The flag looks like an Islamist-Communist organization's flag
I would like to see people put more effort in learning natural languages than Esperanto. And just because some people are freaks and taught their children Esperanto as a native language doesn't make it a "natural language". Those people will creolize the language into some sort of Esperanglish... maybe. While an interesting experiment in the whole Whorf-Sapir thing, I just don't see a use for it.
The whole philosophy of "one language for the world" is actually frightening to me and 1984-esque.

ni ez naiz aldatuko 06:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, my friend Joshua points out that a feminie suffix (-ino) is dumb. And stupid. ni ez naiz aldatuko 06:11, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Basque Portal?

Kaixo, I'm contacting you because you figure in Category:User eu, meaning that you speak some Basque. You must therefore be Basque yourself or have an intense connection with the Basque Country.

I am thinking that maybe was a good idea to create a Portal (or maybe a Wikiproject? or both?) on the Basque theme but I feel such kind of project requires more than just one person.

If you are interested, please comment in my talk page.

Enjoy, --Sugaar 10:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User euskal herria-bai

A tag has been placed on Template:User euskal herria-bai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]